Not really.
I'll just rewrite them in go if there isn't a tool I need, or it the
interface is crappy. I have built a few databases from scratch, so writing
simple tools is trivial.
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 5:25 pm Tyler Compton, wrote:
> I saw yq but it seemed like it was written in python, which
>
> I saw yq but it seemed like it was written in python, which I have no time
> for.
>
You're going to be limiting your tooling options quite a bit in that case
:)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:49 AM alex breadman wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I just did it for fun actually, and for the
Thanks for the reply.
I just did it for fun actually, and for the purpose of learning to make
GitHub actions.
I saw yq but it seemed like it was written in python, which I have no time
for.
The dasel one looks the best imo.
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 4:41 pm Howard C. Shaw III,
wrote:
> If
If written because you needed experience and writing a program to perform a
task you need done is better for learning, then go you! But if you are
legitimately looking to solve a problem, you might want to throw a quick
search out first before implementing Yet Another X.
For yamlfukr update