Re: [go-nuts] Re: Question about "go get", modules and indirect dependencies

2021-01-06 Thread Orson Cart
Thanks for the suggestions and the issue link. That did the trick: go list -m all Thanks for your help. On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 18:39:03 UTC Bryan C. Mills wrote: > Yeah, that's exactly https://golang.org/issue/42723. `go list` shouldn't > need to read those files. > > In the meanti

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Question about "go get", modules and indirect dependencies

2021-01-06 Thread 'Bryan C. Mills' via golang-nuts
Yeah, that's exactly https://golang.org/issue/42723. `go list` shouldn't need to read those files. In the meantime, you could try `go list all` and/or `go mod tidy` after your `go get`..? On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:27 PM Orson Cart wrote: > Thanks for the advice Bryan. > > Sadly I tried using go

[go-nuts] Re: Question about "go get", modules and indirect dependencies

2021-01-06 Thread Orson Cart
Thanks for the advice Bryan. Sadly I tried using go mod download but I'm still seeing the same problem. I'm concerned that it might be something environmental. The module that's been causing me the issue is github.com/jung-kurt/gofpdf v1.16.2 I tried again but this time with a different modul

[go-nuts] Re: Question about "go get", modules and indirect dependencies

2021-01-06 Thread 'Bryan C. Mills' via golang-nuts
`go mod download` should include `.info` files for the requested module(s), or for all dependencies of your module (if you don't give any specific modules as arguments). That said, .info files are not particularly useful in general, and the `go` command should probably read them less than in do