[go-nuts] Re: SSA-able and canSSA meaning in Go compiler's SSA backend?

> Here is a link to a talk from a Go developer about adding SSA to the compiler That Go developer is the one who answered OP's question :) On Thursday, 19 September 2019 17:55:33 UTC+5:30, howar...@gmail.com wrote: > > Read this wiki page to understand what the goal is: >

[go-nuts] Re: SSA-able and canSSA meaning in Go compiler's SSA backend?

Read this wiki page to understand what the goal is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_single_assignment_form Basically, SSA-form allows certain optimizations that are harder without it, but SSA is also itself hard to apply. SSA examples are often posed in the form of simple variables, but

[go-nuts] Re: SSA-able and canSSA meaning in Go compiler's SSA backend?

Read this wiki page to understand what the goal is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_single_assignment_form Basically, SSA-form allows certain optimizations that are harder without it, but SSA is also itself hard to apply. SSA examples are often posed in the form of simple variables, but

[go-nuts] Re: SSA-able and canSSA meaning in Go compiler's SSA backend?

Read this wiki page to understand what the goal is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_single_assignment_form Basically, SSA-form allows certain optimizations that are harder without it, but SSA is also itself hard to apply. SSA examples are often posed in the form of simple variables, but

[go-nuts] Re: SSA-able and canSSA meaning in Go compiler's SSA backend?

On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 1:50:27 PM UTC-7, Mohit Verma wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was reading Go compiler's SSA backend code at > cmd/compile/internal/gc/ssa/go > > & > cmd/compile/internal/ssa >