On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 12:00:46 UTC-4, HWJ wrote:
>
> TL;DR: what's the best way to do SSA back-translation when using
> x/tools/go/ssa?
>
> I'm thinking about a Go compiler which accepts a subset of Go and emits
> assembly for a microcontroller. Instead of going all the way from
>
>
>
> In order to generate assembly code I need to remove the Phi functions
> and rename the registers accordingly. The register field in SSA is not
> exported and can be accessed read-only by Name(). This makes SSA
> back-translation cumbersome.
>
My experience in TARDISgo was that Name()
