Re: [go-nuts] Re: unexpected fault address 0xfffffff800000019

2021-03-25 Thread Kurtis Rader
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 7:34 AM Amnon wrote: > I would check if it reproduces on Go 1.16.2 > Testing whether a problem exists with the most release of a particular command (or project/ecosystem) is generally good advice. However, I don't see how your reply is useful, @Amnon Baron Cohen , in

Re: [go-nuts] Re: unexpected fault address 0xfffffff800000019

2021-03-25 Thread Amnon
I would check if it reproduces on Go 1.16.2 On Thursday, 25 March 2021 at 05:50:24 UTC Kurtis Rader wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:25 PM Kurtis Rader wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:05 PM awer...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> Oh, we've got another confirmed case of the scary runtime

Re: [go-nuts] Re: unexpected fault address 0xfffffff800000019

2021-03-24 Thread Kurtis Rader
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:25 PM Kurtis Rader wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:05 PM awer...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Oh, we've got another confirmed case of the scary runtime error. I guess >> now the question is, does anybody know of any memory corruption bugs in >> macOS and go1.15.5? I

Re: [go-nuts] Re: unexpected fault address 0xfffffff800000019

2021-03-24 Thread Kurtis Rader
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:05 PM awer...@gmail.com wrote: > Oh, we've got another confirmed case of the scary runtime error. I guess > now the question is, does anybody know of any memory corruption bugs in > macOS and go1.15.5? I didn't see anything obvious. > I'm unaware of any memory

[go-nuts] Re: unexpected fault address 0xfffffff800000019

2021-03-24 Thread awer...@gmail.com
Oh, we've got another confirmed case of the scary runtime error. I guess now the question is, does anybody know of any memory corruption bugs in macOS and go1.15.5? I didn't see anything obvious. runtime: gp: gp=0xc000802900, goid=0, gp->atomicstatus=0 runtime: g: g=0xc000602480, goid=0,