I have no problem assigning iota to variables. Can you elaborate a bit pls?
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 9:19:46 AM UTC-4, T L wrote:
>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:27:47 PM UTC+8, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> I have no problem assigning iota to variables. Can you elaborate a bit
> pls?
>
package main
var a = iota // undefined: iota
func main(){
var a = iota // undefined: iota
}
>
> On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 9:19:46 AM U
Oh, I misread the title.
But iota only change while defining constance. Assigning them to variables
will either get zero all the time, or Go need to define a very complicated
theme how iota change while defining variables, very complicated I assume.
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:39:47 AM U
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:45:09 PM UTC+8, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> Oh, I misread the title.
>
> But iota only change while defining constance. Assigning them to variables
> will either get zero all the time, or Go need to define a very complicated
> theme how iota change while defining variab
I think it has been pointed out to you before, that go isn't a project
where "The request is not essential, but any harm of it?" is an acceptable
justification to add things.
Or, to put it another way: Any addition has a harm, which is, that it's
complicating the language. You need to make your ar
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:51:00 PM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> I think it has been pointed out to you before, that go isn't a project
> where "The request is not essential, but any harm of it?" is an acceptable
> justification to add things.
>
> Or, to put it another way: Any addition h
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:59:34 PM UTC+8, T L wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:51:00 PM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>>
>> I think it has been pointed out to you before, that go isn't a project
>> where "The request is not essential, but any harm of it?" is an acceptable
>> jus
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:59 PM, T L wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:51:00 PM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>>
>> I think it has been pointed out to you before, that go isn't a project
>> where "The request is not essential, but any harm of it?" is an acceptable
>> justification to add thing
