On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> I rather like Go's loops, they are simple and easy to remember, and the
> problem so many languages have with dozens of different loop keywords is
> neatly avoided. Too many loop types is simply a pain, but I think that one
> more wouldn't hurt...
>
> Basi
I agree that a new keyword seems like overkill, which is one reason I asked
for other's ideas.
I don't particularly agree that there is no need for a loop that checks its
condition after instead of before, but in any case it's not a big deal.
Mostly I am interesting in what others think.
On Fr
I rather like Go's loops, they are simple and easy to remember, and the
problem so many languages have with dozens of different loop keywords is
neatly avoided. Too many loop types is simply a pain, but I think that one
more wouldn't hurt...
Basically the following would be helpful in some case
