Hi Scott,
It's impossible to say without more details - what are you trying to
achieve, what is your model design, and why do you think this will be a
problem? It'd probably be better if you started a new thread - here or on
Stack Overflow - with more details.
-Nick Johnson
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011
Hi Mos,
The short answer is that you should use entity groups if and only if you
need transactionality for the entities in that group. If you don't, put
them in separate entity groups. If you have a firm requirement for
transactionality but you can't put the relevant entities in the same group
(fo
Whats the name of that form Brandon?
On Oct 25, 6:04 am, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote:
> There is a form you can fill out with the US Government to get your tax
> back.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
>
> [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On
I'm quite sure this is automated based on heuristics and statistics.
Or maybe someone send an email to abuse or postmaster.
http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=33389&topic=15892
I'll file a bug report on this problem (silently not delivering
emails) when my account is react
Good catch! Thanks for helping me figure this out! Now to figure out
which part of the TOS I am in violation of, if any.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
There is a form you can fill out with the US Government to get your tax
back.
-Original Message-
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 8:31 PM
To: Google App Engine
Subject: [google-appengine] Re:
See the other current thread about email - one person had their email
address suspended due to abuse.
On Oct 23, 3:16 am, Leandro Rezende wrote:
> Both application are on same google account, same admin, same deployed code.
>
> 2011/10/22 Greg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Make sure SMTP_AUTH_USER is actual
On Oct 23, 10:38 am, Stéphane Cohen wrote:
> However, as I am not a US resident I am not suposed to pay this tax.
This is going to become a significant problem when the new billing
starts. Google might like to think about being able to set accounts as
non-resident and not billing those accounts f
Long shot ... any chance your old app is still running? If so, could task
queues/cron jobs on the old app might be hitting the new app and causing an
increase in writes? Of course ... you would see additional load if this were
the case.
This would be much easier to solve if we knew which handlers
I want to assign a list to reply_to field in message.
Like this:
reply_tos = ['ema...@gmail.com', 'ema...@gmail.com', 'ema...@gmail.com']
message.reply_to = reply_tos
1) does appengine Email allows this? It is defined in
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0822.txt
4.4.3. REPLY-TO / RESENT-REPLY-TO
This
I don't think that there would be policy specific to GAE, or AWS for that
matter. What I've seen (NIH) is mostly concerned with standards for
securing private data (e.g. passwords, SSL, etc), portability and auditing.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
There is a limit of 100 tasks max per single BulkAdd call. I am not aware of
any limitations (other than quota) if you spread tasks creations across
multiple BulkAdd calls.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this disc
Alright, I've contacted Google Apps support. It worries me that
harmless mail accounts can be suspended (probably automated though),
but moreso that the administator isn't notified about it. If I wasn't
subscribed to my own service I might've not noticed for days or weeks.
--
You received this me
+1 to your approach :)
In Siena, I introduced the so-called "aggregation" which is entity group in
a more generic way.
It gives a very interesting way to design your models and fits lots of
situations!
Pascal
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> I used to advise people to us
I used to advise people to use shared entity groups as little as possible.
That was on M/S. I have found that the HRD changes everything, and now I
use hierarchical entity groups quite a lot.
>From previous discussions here, HRD eventuality is usually seconds,
sometimes minutes, and in catastrop
Well, I just logged into Google Apps and noticed that Google suspended
the email address for abuse! I've got no idea why, and wasn't notified
about this either! Who can I contact about this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
T
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Gerald Tan wrote:
> There are two methods I can think of.
> 1) Copy on Write Entities - persist a new copy of the entity each time you
> want to update it, together with the timestamp it is written. When you want
> to retrieve the entity, query for the latest ver
There are two methods I can think of.
1) Copy on Write Entities - persist a new copy of the entity each time you
want to update it, together with the timestamp it is written. When you want
to retrieve the entity, query for the latest version.
2) Use a backend instance to store the entities into
Hello,
Is there a limit to how many tasks a single task can kick off? We're
getting around 25000 tasks and its throwing an error about BulkAdd()
error. Is there a "flush" for a queue in java code?
Thanks,
Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Goog
I should be sad because of this bug, but I'm happy to know that I am not the
only one with the problem
2011/10/24 pdknsk
> I'm noticing this as well since today. This is not good!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To
I'm noticing this as well since today. This is not good!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine
Also, is there any way to know that I'm updating an entity group
sooner than once a second?
Thanks!
On Oct 24, 7:26 am, Scott Lewis wrote:
> I'm writing a multiplayer game using App Engine. What are ways I can
> work around the 1 write per second within an entity group? I don't
> know when a mes
I believe that GAE/J may now feature data exchange with a Google SQL-
friendly database. Check out the GAE community/documentation for
details. I don't know how MySQL-friendly this SQL functionality is.
There may be an API you can look at to find out...
On Oct 24, 12:40 pm, nikesh pathak wrote:
What is the US government policy (at federal, state, county levels, etc.)
for using software services running on GAE?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.
thank you sir...
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Ian Marshall wrote:
> App Engine itself persists data in the Google datastore only (ignoring
> the temporary memcache and things like enqueued tasks and sending data
> outside of App Engine for storage).
>
> The same will apply to an App Engine we
I'm writing a multiplayer game using App Engine. What are ways I can
work around the 1 write per second within an entity group? I don't
know when a message acknowledgement will return from a client, and
with the unreliable nature of the memcache, I'm at a loss at where I
can store my data to make s
App Engine itself persists data in the Google datastore only (ignoring
the temporary memcache and things like enqueued tasks and sending data
outside of App Engine for storage).
The same will apply to an App Engine web application running on a
local instance of the development application server,
Thanks for the feedback.
Regarding eventually consistency one advice of this talk was:
"Accept it."
I think for many use-cases in typical web-application this is ok.
For showing a use his own post immediately, you can remember the key of the
entity and add it manually to the query-list (if not yet
28 matches
Mail list logo
