[google-appengine] Re: Reverse Proxy for custom domain SSL and Users Service possible?

I don't think that would work. If I login and get redirected to blah.appspot.com, then manually go to securedomain.com, it doesn't realize I'm logged in. The cookie for auth gets set for blah.appspot.com instead of for securedomain.com. I don't see why automating the redirect would do someth

[google-appengine] Re: Reverse Proxy for custom domain SSL and Users Service possible?

How about having the continue url page check if it's being called on appspot, and then forwarding to your 'correct' url? Then you can continue using Users etc and just have a tiny bounce in-between that'll be hardly noticeable. Using Users is a longer-term decision, the current problem is (hope

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

how long is a standard request (Milliseconds)? How long is a the DEE request? What are your max pending latency and idle instance settings? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng

[google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

Yup - still waiting for resolution on deadlineexceeded exceptions...2+ weeks and counting. Even migrated to HRD (even though our app doesn't use data store at all) Still nothing. And no way to contact anyone or find out what's going on. The thing that pisses me off the most is if you look at t

[google-appengine] Reverse Proxy for custom domain SSL and Users Service possible?

I set up a reverse proxy with nginx on ec2 to provide ssl for my appengine custom domain. It works until users need to login. The users are redirected to my appspot url after authenticating if I provide a relative continue url. I tried setting the continue parameter with the entire url (the

[google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

> Just between us, when will Muggels get a permission to use: > HTTPS and FulltextSearch? +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [google-appengine] Google App Engine as Jabber Server

You can't do what you are trying to do with App Engine. I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to achieve, but you can have a look at the links below, otherwise you would need to host your own xmpp server. Google Apps: http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=60767&topic=10179&c

Re: [google-appengine] changing an entity's entity group with existing data

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:53 PM, doright wrote: > So my question is: > - what happens to existing data if I go and change the entity group of an > entity? Just to offer some clarification on this point: You cannot "change" the entity group of an entity. The entity group is part of what defines

[google-appengine] changing an entity's entity group with existing data

I run an app on GAEJ, using JDO. It's been live and has had paying customers for over a year now. It using master/slave but I'm considering migrating to HRD. Having just watched the "more 9's please" vid: http://www.google.com/events/io/2011/sessions/more-9s-please-under-the-covers-of-the-high-

[google-appengine] Re: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

I had to tweak my path to accommodate the new webob but then all our regression tests passed just fine. Thanks for taking care to add functionality without regressing anything. Still looking forward to having some of the aging bugsfixed and some of the long time

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Frontend Instance Class (Default F1? 128MB?) All my instances have been running around 256MB

ok, thanks, but there is clearly quite a bit of tolerance here. (probably due to the process vs heap sizes mentioned in the OP) I've frequently seen instances of "size" 163MB sitting happily in the instance list. It would be nice to know what is the actual trigger point. Does this include any

Re: [google-appengine] Google App Engine as Jabber Server

> > I want that a use myuser@app...@appspot.com can use app...@appspot.com as > a jabber server and they should connect via a native client like PSI or > Trillian... > ANYTHING@APP_ID.appspotchat.com is just another use of the backend account app...@appspot.com -- You received this message

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine as Jabber Server

> > Hey! > > This is not an option. I need no accounts on the backend. I need it as client.. so that I can use it in native clients like trillian or psi. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web

Re: [google-appengine] Google App Engine as Jabber Server

See [1], you can use app...@appspot.com or ANYTHING@APP_ID.appspotchat.com. Also, there is an accepted issue to allow xmpp on your own domain at [2], so based on current progress, that should be ready in 8 to 10 years. [1] http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/xmpp/overview.html [2] http://

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine as Jabber Server

As documented here; http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/xmpp/overview.html#XMPP_Addresses Your app can use XMPP address in the following format: *anything*@*your_app_id*.appspotchat.com cheers Fábio On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:32:24 PM UTC-3, Markus Unger wrote: > > Hey! > > Is ther

[google-appengine] Re: Java Channel API limits

Thank you Richard, I have put the question on stacksoverflow :) I hope to get luck :D El lunes 19 de marzo de 2012 19:16:40 UTC+1, Richard Watson escribió: > > I gotcha. I think that if you pay the $500 a month support > protection-money you get more reliable answers, but I'm not sure since I

[google-appengine] Re: Java Channel API limits

Thank you Heiko, but I have sent a message to this link two weeks ago to get information... and I'm still waiting the answer. :( El lunes 19 de marzo de 2012 20:36:52 UTC+1, Heiko Roth escribió: > > You can increase limits at: > > > http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/appengine/docs/quotas.html > >

[google-appengine] Google App Engine as Jabber Server

Hey! Is there a way to create accounts for my current Google App Engine Account? Currently I can just use app...@appspot.com to send and receive messages. But I still want to create my own accounts with password maybe like this user1_app...@appspot.com Is this possible with the current GAE? R

[google-appengine] Re: 500 errors + high latency + please communicate with us

My app is experiencing the same kind of problems - suddenly the latency increased and HTTP 500 errors. I'm using HR-datastore and my app is very simple and does not a lot of things. I'm using prodeagle monitoring though (every minute there is a monitoring request) - no changes made in my app, I

Re: [google-appengine] realy upset

Sana, i had the same doubt that u are having.. i found the solution at http://ikaisays.com/2010/09/08/gwt-blobstore-the-new-high-performance-image-serving-api-and-cute-dogs-on-office-chairs/ i hope it helps u too 2012/3/20 Barry Hunter > I suspect you first need to brush up on question as

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Switched to HRD - So far not impressed

Most of the time 'first reply' works even when using strong consistency because we cache the state of entity groups in all replicas. Though to read from a replica, it has to be up to date. So setting eventual consistency will help you if an entity group is written to a lot (likely not up to date) o

[google-appengine] Beware: slight NDB incompatibilities coming soon

(If you're using Java or if you are not yet using NDB with Python you can ignore this post.) Now that the 1.6.4 prerelease SDK is public (http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/detail?name=google_appengine_1.6.4_prerelease.zip) I'd like to remind NDB users that the next version of NDB

[google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

Just between us, when will Muggels get a permission to use: HTTPS and FulltextSearch? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, se

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

Appengine is a big team. There will always be some people working on reliability while others work on features. This isn't an either/or situation... and it probably doesn't help to dogpile everyone on specific bugs. Also: From observation, GAE has a deep queue of features that slowly roll out t

[google-appengine] Re: how do I get my 'Recipients Emailed' quota back after hrd migration?

Per, Thanks for the valuable feedback! I'll forward this to the team so we can add this to our migration documentation to avoid this issue in the near future. Best, Jose On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:43:17 AM UTC-7, Per wrote: > > > > Hi Jose, thanks for that link. > > I just did the migratio

[google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

I'm sorry but I think I have to back up Mos here. I'm as excited about the new-shiny as anyone else, but no amount of new-shiny makes up for the frayed nerves of annoyed users, instance-spawning chaos, requests that never even reach my app, silence from google, a completely oblivious status page, a

Re: [google-appengine] Re: More then 100 complains and no feedback from Google. Was: Outages?

That's what I had thought as well - since we aren't using datastore at all - but others suggested that there might be more stability from migrating off of M/S - and it actually *has* been more stable. The error I got may have been a fluke...it's the only one I've had in 24 hours. -Nathan On T

Re: [google-appengine] Re: More then 100 complains and no feedback from Google. Was: Outages?

It was actually pretty automatic - but I didn't have any data (I wasn't using a datastore at all)...so it was more an effort of just building and uploading to a different application. The biggest issue we had was getting billing set up (not a google/appengine issue - a company accounting proces

Re: [google-appengine] Best practices to authenticate requests comming from my AppEngine app

Thanks for your reply Brandon. We are doing this currently, but this adds some small network overhead. We are not using Dreamhost, we have a VPS here in our country, with an Apache mod_proxy server to route the requests to the destination. Good to know from experts that this is a good way to sol

Re: [google-appengine] Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

Awesome. Tons of good features here. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 19:10, Marzia Niccolai wrote: > Hi, > > The 1.6.4 prerelease SDKs are now available to download for Python and Java > here: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/list > > Please see release notes below. > > -Marzia > >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Frontend Instance Class (Default F1? 128MB?) All my instances have been running around 256MB

the instances will restart. you can see how long every instance was up on the instances screen in the admin On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:32 PM, doright wrote: > I'm hoping its not too late to revive this thread. > > I still don't understand. Specifically, in java, what happens when my > instance mem

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

> > - Billed applications which have specified additional logs storage over 1 > GB > are now being charged for that storage at $0.24/GB/month. > > What's actually happening is that we are hiding logs, but once 1.6.4 is > released, we will be deleting logs greater than 1gb. With 1.6.3 we release

[google-appengine] Re: how do I get my 'Recipients Emailed' quota back after hrd migration?

Hi Jose, thanks for that link. I just did the migration to HRD, and it was not at all obvious to me that this limit gets re-introduced despite having been a paying GAE user for a year now. The migration guide says to "update billing", which I did. A link to the URL mentioned by Jose would ha

Re: [google-appengine] Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

Please GAE-Team, stop developing features and take care of basic functionality and reliability of your platform. New features doesn't make even sense if you can't stick to your basic non-functional promises (latency, reliability, scaling, performance). For example: http://groups.google.com/group/g

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

I'm hoping you guys saw this: - Billed applications which have specified additional logs storage over 1 GB are now being charged for that storage at $0.24/GB/month. What's actually happening is that we are hiding logs, but once 1.6.4 is released, we will be deleting logs greater than 1gb. With 1

Re: [google-appengine] Re: More then 100 complains and no feedback from Google. Was: Outages?

The current problems have nothing to do with M/S in my experience On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Dennis wrote: > I'm planning to do the same (migrate to HRD), but now my expectation have > been lowered... > > Any tips on doing the migration?? The docs make it look pretty automatic, > but

Re: [google-appengine] realy upset

I suspect you first need to brush up on question asking skills. A useful guide: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#intro On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, sana wrote: > please help me experts!! > i am creating a website through app engine plugins in java. my task is > to save the

[google-appengine] Re: Trouble with sending emails

Hi, Until you are charged for the first time, your quota remains at 100 emails. Basically, it takes a week for the email quota to kick in. Cheers, Simon On Monday, 19 March 2012 15:21:28 UTC, Nicole K wrote: > > I am new to Google apps and currently use it to register HS students > for Advanc

[google-appengine] Re: Fwd: 1.6.4 Prerelease Now Available

> - Fixed an issue where did not work. >    http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5774 Thanks for fixing this. Can we implore Googlers to fix this too? http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6236 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [google-appengine] Re: More then 100 complains and no feedback from Google. Was: Outages?

I'm planning to do the same (migrate to HRD), but now my expectation have been lowered... Any tips on doing the migration?? The docs make it look pretty automatic, but it sounds like you spent a more realistic amount of time doing the migration Dennis On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:28:00