What do you mean with the logic out of view layer? I haven't seen
unnecessary logic on view.
Thanks for your comment, But this is a open source project to help to
developers and if you want improve it, show us where and how in order to
discuss it.
Best,
Rodrigo
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012, Jason C
I like the idea and the initiative! But please move your logic out of
your view layer and in to a domain layer for the sake of testability!
j
On Jun 10, 6:59 pm, coto wrote:
> I am very happy to announce that the second release of Google App Engine
> Boilerplate
> is now available for download
Jeff,
I haven't seen the problem since I made the change, and it seemed
consistent under certain circumstances before that point. However, I have
relatively few data points, so I wouldn't call it conclusive. If I have
time, I will switch the transaction back to Objectify and see if that
causes
I receive an error whentrying to login to my google enagage account:
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention this
error message and the query that caused it.
What is it causing this?
--
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, saintthor wrote:
> urlfetch? xmpp? any better ways?
Depends a lot on what you want to share. How real time and what
payload size is.
Another option is CloudSQL. A single sql instance can be accessed from
multiple app engine apps.
Can also use the Remote API inte
urlfetch? xmpp? any better ways?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/LxyNAEJ78vgJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengin
Wasn't a caching issue (unless Google's Edge cache isn't domain aware). Was
a mixture of using class-based views, lazy loading, and not understanding
the underlying framework execution path fully. A little more digging and I
found a thread-safe way to utilize class based views with lazy loading.
*typo over here
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/EpHdS8UdY6IJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.c
yeah thats a typoover here.
i did write
import google.appengine.ext
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/pt8n6VUNnDYJ.
To post to this
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 18:24:03 UTC+7, Dao Linh Viet wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 06:20:08 UTC+7, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
>>
>> Ah, sorry that wasn't clear to me.
>>
>> I'm not sure how the presence of Objectify in this chain could make
>> any difference. There's nothing special abo
On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 06:20:08 UTC+7, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
>
> Ah, sorry that wasn't clear to me.
>
> I'm not sure how the presence of Objectify in this chain could make
> any difference. There's nothing special about the way Objectify
> starts or commits a transaction. Was this behavior
On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:51:08 UTC+7, FastGeert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> last night our application suffered
> from java.util.ConcurrentModificationException on committing a transaction
> with only task queue entries.
>
> The transaction only had to persist 5 task queue entries, no additional
> ch
I'd suggest trying out e.g. MailGun or one of the email specialist
companies. They live and die by their deliverability, so they have
excellent incentives to get your mail through.
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 12:05:35 AM UTC+2, Fabien Henon wrote:
>
> Hi everyone !
>
> I'm having issues with the
I have registered the issue. Check link
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7677&thanks=7677&ts=1339489279
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Takashi Matsuo wrote:
> Hi swapnil, Mauricio,
>
> It seems that 3 hours is totally strange to me.
>
> Can you tell me the spec of
I experienced it once, and changed my code to solve the problem differently.
Did not have the luxury to investigate it further.
Geert.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
> Ah, sorry that wasn't clear to me.
>
> I'm not sure how the presence of Objectify in this chain could
15 matches
Mail list logo
