this should be working now
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 00:43:09 UTC+2, barryhunter wrote:
btw here is a hurl permalink
http://hurl.it/hurls/232012465c276ee070f25d433d9bfa417d54a375/a5fab29ab28f158ea5491a8745d9391e223cc07e
demonstrating the issue.
--
You received this message because
I don't even want the source code, just the binaries. Then I can use a
Java decompiler to get back my source code. But alas!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Should report it here too
http://support.google.com/code/bin/request.py?contact_type=AppEngineAbuse
On Sep 15, 2012 9:26 PM, Carl c...@thursby.com wrote:
I have a problem with form submission on my site. They seem automated,
they're all spam, they have source IP addresses from Google's range
This thread is three years old, for current information on how to download
your application, see the documentation:
https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/uploadinganapp#Downloading_an_Application
Also, there is no excuse for not using version control (bitbucket offers
free
Bah. There are millions of decisions you make when building on GAE
which have all kinds of implications on performance and behavior. If
you have inexperienced devs which don't understand the implications of
the data model, you're going to have worse problems than transactions
that run slower
Requiring explicit xg means preserving the current api and semantics.
Which I would imagine
is the reason. xg transactions will fail if you have too many different
entity groups in the transaction
so, requiring some thought before turning it on is probably a good idea,
otherwise a lot of
Nonsense. Zero working code would be broken by permanently enabling
XG transactions. The only change is that code which was broken before
would no longer be broken. Which is kinda the point.
Jeff
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:01 PM, timh zutes...@gmail.com wrote:
Requiring explicit xg means
Will the maven repository continue to be updated with for the appengine?
1.7.1 was never updated in net/kindleit/gae-runtime/, and I see that 1.7.2
has is already in pre-release. Or has it been moved and I just missed that?
~Rik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Soon.
https://github.com/maven-gae-plugin/maven-gae-plugin/pull/46
P.S. the gae-runtime plugin is not maintained by google so this is the
wrong place to ask.
On 17 September 2012 10:08, Rik Scarborough rik...@gmail.com wrote:
Will the maven repository continue to be updated with for the
inline
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, James Broberg jbrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Soon.
Thank you.
https://github.com/maven-gae-plugin/maven-gae-plugin/pull/46
P.S. the gae-runtime plugin is not maintained by google so this is the
wrong place to ask.
My apologies, I will research it
No problem! The flow is usually something like:
1. Google push new SDK to maven central
2. Someone (sometimes me) updates the code in the maven-gae-plugin on
github to point to new SDK
3. One of the maintainers of the maven-gae-plugin (not me) pushes a new
release of the plugin to maven central
Hey, I was just guessing as to their reasoning. I happen to agree with
their position.
T
On Monday, September 17, 2012 7:41:06 AM UTC+8, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
Nonsense. Zero working code would be broken by permanently enabling
XG transactions. The only change is that code which was
Thank you for your work. You make my life easier.
~Rik
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:47 PM, James Broberg jbrob...@gmail.com wrote:
No problem! The flow is usually something like:
1. Google push new SDK to maven central
2. Someone (sometimes me) updates the code in the maven-gae-plugin on
Hi,
I've just migrated one of our App Engine applications from Blobstore to
Google Cloud Storage and am using the ImagesService.getServingUrl to serve
images.
After uploading a new/changed image using a Google Cloud Storage name of an
existing image, the ImagesService.getServingUrl still
Hi,
Do you know if there is some problem verifying DKIM when you set ti up?
I have been trying for a week now on 2 different domains and it has been
imposible.
I have added the TXT records on my domain and when I
click authenticate doesn't work.
Thanks!
--
You received this message because
On 12 September 2012 23:57, Jason jaso...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to do it in one query, you could add a field that is used
specifically for sorting. If the value of the normal field is positive,
the sort field would be the same as the normal field. If the value of the
normal field is
hi all,
There will be an App Engine hangout on Wed., Sept. 19th, at 4:00pm Pacific
time (23:00 UTC).
Visit this Google Developers live event page to find the hangout when it
starts up:
http://goo.gl/JoDQ3
This week we'll hold general office hours, so submit your questions here:
17 matches
Mail list logo
