[google-appengine] Help on a study about choosing the right programming language

Hey, guys I'm working on a research to provide an academic background to support GAE developers on choosing the right programming language for a project. In the study, I evaluate the programming languages according to some criteria, among them, readability. To do so, I need your help by analysin

[google-appengine] Re: Google Analytics showing source/medium as appengine.google.com/referral for sessions using Google Sign-In

Hi Patrice, Thank you for your effort. I do appreciate it. What I'm really after is a workaround, though. I don't really think of this as a bug as much as an unintended side-effect of sending users to a Google login and back again. I'd rather that App Engine engineers focus on more pressing stu

[google-appengine] Versioning issue with appengine-java-sdk-1.9.24 and Eclipse

I downloaded appengine-java-sdk-1.9.24.zip from https://cloud.google.com/appengine/downloads, unzipped it, and Added it to the SDKs in my Eclipse plugin. But when that was done, the Version for it only showed as 1.9.22 (previously I had appengine-java-sdk-1.9.20 installed). Then in Eclip

[google-appengine] Re: URGENT: 1.9.25 causes many errors in my python app

I immediately replied to Patrice but I have not heard back. In the meantime several 1.9.25 instances keep starting and they immediately die. Fortunately, 1.9.24 instances are also starting and they serve correctly some of the load so it is not as horrible as it could be but is bad. Customers, s

[google-appengine] Re: URGENT: 1.9.25 causes many errors in my python app

Hi PK Do you mind giving us the app ID for your project so we can look into it? Cheers! On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 7:18:53 PM UTC-4, PK wrote: > > My code fails really early on because some initialization assertions fire. > The assertions suggest that the same module is initialized multiple ti

[google-appengine] Re: URGENT: 1.9.25 causes many errors in my python app

My code fails really early on because some initialization assertions fire. The assertions suggest that the same module is initialized multiple times. Have you been changing something fundamental in python27 as you roll out 1.9.25? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[google-appengine] Re: Can't download data

Hi again Brandon. So I looked into your domains and I can see that soccos.me is a google Apps domain and that you indeed own it. Where does socoslearning.com comes from though? In general, you can see the custom domains setup on your application by going to "console.developers.google.com", the

[google-appengine] URGENT: 1.9.25 causes many errors in my python app

My service has been unstable today. I think it is related to some new instances that start with 1.9.25 and fail with errors I have not seen before, the instances with 1.9.24 do not have the issue. I see some instances still start with 1.9.24 fortunately... Is Google aware of this? PK p...@g

[google-appengine] Re: cannot delete application

Hi, So, to keep everything up to date here : I got two screenshots from the original poster (not including them here for privacy reasons) : One for a deletion supposed to happen tomorrow, one for a deletion supposed to happen yesterday. In general, deleting is done after 72 hours, but it can s

[google-appengine] Re: Google Analytics showing source/medium as appengine.google.com/referral for sessions using Google Sign-In

Hi James! So as I said yesterday, I created this issue to track your specific case. If you could go on this and add your exact full login code (complete with the Oauth flow), it would be helpful. Also feel free to star the issu

[google-appengine] Re: Have you had success with Traffic Splitting? How do you use it to roll out new versions?

(For the model/schema change, I think that comes down for being prepared to have the schema accessed both ways...e.g., you need to remove a column, you roll out the new code that doesn't use the column...the old code still works with the column there...after you get to 100% on the new version, then

[google-appengine] Re: Have you had success with Traffic Splitting? How do you use it to roll out new versions?

Sure, I don't think David or I have any question of whether canary testing is a possible or intended use case of traffic splitting. I am interested in how folks have implemented it in practice for production apps. For example, I don't have a great solution for canary testing a version which ch

[google-appengine] Re: Have you had success with Traffic Splitting? How do you use it to roll out new versions?

Traffic-splitting / canary releases on App Engine are definitely "a thing". Traffic-splits on non-default modules are now available via API: https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/admin-api/quickstart/#splitting_traffic On Friday, 24 July 2015 11:50:33 UTC-7, Michael Spainhower wrote: > > @

[google-appengine] Re: Can not get authenticated　By Directory API

Hi again Unfortunately at this point I'd say the system knows if they are or are not an admin on their domain, and looking at the error, it seems like they are not. If you're convinced that they indeed are the admins, and that the domain is not mistyped, then I would suggest for your customer

[google-appengine] Re: Have you had success with Traffic Splitting? How do you use it to roll out new versions?

@David, I started following this thread because I have the exact same question and agree the lack of response is worrisome. We are in the Cloud Startup Program and I plan to ask about canary testing during my next engineering 1-on-1. I will reply to this thread with what I learn from their eng

[google-appengine] Re: Idle Dynamic Instance

Hi Paul, Thanks for including that, this was just to make sure everything was okay, just in case. Since you're using the fully default, I think this behavior is actually expected. I would suggest changing a couple of parameters from the default to make sure that this behaves properly. Mainly,

[google-appengine] Re: Can't download data

Just verified that I am an "Owner" of the project. - Brandon On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 5:02:40 PM UTC-7, Brandon Istenes wrote: > > Hi Patrice, > > "socos-quickstep-601" is set up with socos.me and socoslearning.com. I > imagine socoslearning.com is the "custom domain." > > I don't have acce

[google-appengine] Re: Have you had success with Traffic Splitting? How do you use it to roll out new versions?

Any word on when we can use it with non-default modules? On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 6:53:17 PM UTC+1, David Hardwick wrote: > > Hello, > > We haven't used Traffic Splitting yet but it has been an available feature > for a while and rumor has it that traffic splitting for non-default modules >

[google-appengine] Re: Cron - targeting a particular version of a particular module

to add, my above answer only works for cron.yaml On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:59:48 PM UTC+1, Paul Canning wrote: > > Wait, I got it. You can target the versions using the format: > > version-dot-module > > e.g. 1-5-dot-main-module > > On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 3:53:36 PM UTC+1, Paul Cann

[google-appengine] Re: Idle Dynamic Instance

version: 2runtime: python27 api_version: 1threadsafe: true handlers: - url: .. lots of handlers- url: /.* script: main_controller.app libraries:- name: webapp2 version: 2.5.2 - name: jinja2 version: 2.6 There really isn't anything here worth mentioning, its all default On Thursday, July 23, 20

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Push to deploy discontinued?

Any updates on bringing back a simple deploy on git push like it was previously? On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 12:23:28 PM UTC-5, Brad Abrams wrote: > > We really want to enable that use case. The infrastructure we used for > that in the past has proven to not meet our reliability requirements,

[google-appengine] Re: Have you had success with Traffic Splitting? How do you use it to roll out new versions?

Oh boy, the lack of response here is not encouraging On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:53:17 PM UTC-4, David Hardwick wrote: > > Hello, > > We haven't used Traffic Splitting yet but it has been an available feature > for a while and rumor has it that traffic splitting for non-default modules > coul