Re: [google-appengine] How to change the version of Jetty in my Google App Engine

For java 17 bundled services (configured via appengine-web.xml not app.yaml) the jetty version is provided (managed plaform) and cannot be changed. For non bundled services (app.yaml configuration) whatever web server of the market can be used including latest jetty versions. Ludo On 7/27/2

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Questions Re: App Engine bundled services for Java 11

Hi, We have added Java 11 bundled services samples instruction under https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-docs-samples/tree/main/appengine-java11-bundled-services, with 1 full sample available (Datastore). Try the instructions on taskqueues-deferred, pull and push samples for Java8, i

[google-appengine] Re: 500 - Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your reques

Can you tell us with runtime are you using (Java, py, go?) and which versions? Are you app.yaml based or appengine-web.xml based? Ludo On Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 5:50:06 PM UTC+2 Will Reiher wrote: > Totally, not a huge amount of them but definitely more RPC errors and > timeouts in the

[google-appengine] Re: URRGENT - Newer version of my Spring MVC application not instantiating

Can you describe the directory structure of your app (where is appengine-web.xml and your JSPs, maybe with a ls -l web/) and what is the content of appengine-web.xml) See also https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/java11/services/access Ludo On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 7:25:33 A

[google-appengine] Re: Variable substitution in App Engine 11 app.yaml

src/main/appengine/app.yaml is indeed the configuration for pure Java11 apps, bundling your web server... You can now also use the beta Java11 runtime with GAE bundled apis, the same way as Java8 with appengine-web.xml as seen in https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/java11/services/a

[google-appengine] Re: Exceeded hard memory limit of 256 MB on F4 instance at Free Trial

Can you share your source code directory structure, and where is located app.yaml, and how you build then deploy? On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 4:32:30 PM UTC+2 andreas...@gmail.com wrote: > Looks like this is an deployment issue. > > The direct deployment of the quarkus application with ' g

Re: [google-appengine] App Engine 11 with Cloud SQL mysql "No suitable driver"

t...@terratrue.com > wrote: > >> >> No, we are using pure app.yaml, no more appengine-web.xml in our modules. >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 5:24 PM 'Ludovic Champenois' via Google App >> Engine wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Thanks for

Re: [google-appengine] App Engine 11 with Cloud SQL mysql "No suitable driver"

, Cheers, Ludo On Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 7:40:38 PM UTC+2 t...@terratrue.com wrote: > > No, we are using pure app.yaml, no more appengine-web.xml in our modules. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 5:24 PM 'Ludovic Champenois' via Google App Engine > wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [google-appengine] App Engine 11 with Cloud SQL mysql "No suitable driver"

Hi, Thanks for the update and the solution, We are looking and trying to understand the delta between the 2 runtimes... Just to be sure, you are using the new Beta Java11 runtime with bundled APIs (so using appengine-web.xml), right? Ludo On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 1:04:24 PM UTC-7 t...@terra

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Issues with App Engine migration from the legacy SDK (appcfg) to Cloud SDK

It seems it complain about a missing com.google.api.server.spi.EndpointsServlet servlet defined in the web.xml... Maybe you did not add the dependency? Can you see if https://cloud.google.com/endpoints/docs/frameworks/java/migrating is helping you, especially the Gradle section? Cheers, Lu

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Bigger app sizes with Cloud SDK than with AppCfg

There is only 1 staging logic, inside appcfg tooling, which is used (as is) in the cloud SDK, so staging is technically the same. In appcfg, it uses a temporary directory (deleted at the end unless you use a flag to retain the upload dir). In cloud SDK and new plugins, the default location is

Re: [google-appengine] issue of migration from Java8 to Java 11 for app engine standard model

Hi, AppEngine Java11 does not have support for the local appserver emulator, as any type of workload can be used (not a Jetty Servlet Server anymore). So for Java11, the DevAppServerRunner run action is not available (or produces this type of error). Only the deployment action is possible.

[google-appengine] Re: AppEngine Java SDK 1.9.73 is not available in Maven central

Hi, It should be online now, Cheers, On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 5:17:37 AM UTC-7, Yuri Sergiichuk wrote: > > Hi all. > > I've noticed that the 1.9.73 version of the AppEngine Java SDK was > released > back > on March 26,

[google-appengine] Re: GAE java8 switch by simply putting runtime java8 fails:

Hi, Sorry to see the error message... It seems you are using Cloud Endpoints v1? v1 is now deprecated for Java7 and not supported for Java8... Can you try to upgrade to Cloud Endpoints v2? See https://cloud.google.com/endpoints/docs/frameworks/legacy/v1/java/migrating https://cloud.google.com/ap

Re: [google-appengine] Stability of Java 8 on Standard Environment

Hi, Thanks for the feedback. A newer push (soon) will address the load time issue that is related to a wrong timeout value, Cheers, Ludo On 7/11/17 6:00 PM, Thomas Wiradikusuma wrote: I noticed that my app is 0.5mb smaller but takes longer to load and uses more memory. This is simply by

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine standard now supports Java 8

On 6/29/17 5:43 AM, Attila-Mihaly Balazs wrote: +1! Party! :-) Now could we please get connections from GAE standard to the Postgres instances? :-) Sure, can you try https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-docs-samples/tree/master/appengine-java8/postgres and see if it works for you?

Re: [google-appengine] Endpoints build issue GAE 1.9.44

1.9.46 is now out, Ludo On 10/19/16 3:00 PM, Paul Mazzuca wrote: Anyone else encounter the following issue when updating GAE? Updated from 1.9.42 -> 1.9.44 today. Did not change anything except the version. I received the following error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal com.google.appengi

Re: [google-appengine] Endpoints build issue GAE 1.9.44

Hi, So it seems there is a bad dependency to guava 18 instead of 19. Will be fixed in the next release. Ludo On 10/19/16 3:00 PM, Paul Mazzuca wrote: Anyone else encounter the following issue when updating GAE? Updated from 1.9.42 -> 1.9.44 today. Did not change anything except the versio

Re: [google-appengine] Endpoints build issue GAE 1.9.44

Sorry about that. Investigating. Meanwhile, move back to 42, just for Endpoints generation if you can. Thanks. On 10/19/16 3:00 PM, Paul Mazzuca wrote: Anyone else encounter the following issue when updating GAE? Updated from 1.9.42 -> 1.9.44 today. Did not change anything except the versio

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Java 8 and the App Engine

On 5/27/16 2:24 PM, Stefan Falk wrote: It appears that Java 8 is still not supported .. I am currently developing a GWT application and I compile both, the client and the server, against Java 8 .. I recently discovered that if I deploy my application to GAE that I get the "Unsupported major.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: AppEngine Endpoints Issue?

Fixed in 1.9.38. Ludo On 5/28/16 7:26 AM, Shruti Bilgundi wrote: Facing the same issue.. Does it work with the version 1.9.36? On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 7:04:19 AM UTC+5:30, Ludovic Champenois wrote: I think the issue got fixed in 1.9.38 that should be out shortly. Meanwhile, you ca

Re: [google-appengine] Re: AppEngine Endpoints Issue?

I think the issue got fixed in 1.9.38 that should be out shortly. Meanwhile, you can revert to 1.9.36, Ludo On 5/21/16 9:00 AM, Olukorede Aguda wrote: Also facing this issue. Any update? It doesn't help that we're running into this while evaluating adoption of AppEngine :( On Tuesday, 10 May 2

Re: [google-appengine] Re: AppEngine Endpoints Issue?

Investigating, Thanks for the detailled info, Ludo On 5/11/16 8:14 AM, Paul Mazzuca wrote: I think this is a bug in GAE. I also think that it can affect deployed instances since GAE uses the latest version in production. I would be interested in knowing if there is a workaround or if we have t

Re: [google-appengine] GAE Java FE env deployment issue

All of the permissions are enabled in console but still the error persists. Could you pls help on the same ? Do a gcloud config list and see if the account listed here is an owner. Ludo On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:07 AM, 'ludovic Champenois' via Google App Engine <mailto:google-app

Re: [google-appengine] GAE Java FE env deployment issue

So I guess you've been using the appcfg.sh tool to deploy a web app built the way you want...(maybe via Ant?) Continue to do that, but change the flags used by appcfg and replace the update subcommand with the stage sub command. The stage subcommand takes an extra param at the end that is the

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How can i set an order for .jar files in WEB-INF/lib

On 1/28/16 12:36 AM, Manuel Werder wrote: yeah it was: com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$FeatureNotEnabledException: The Socket API will be enabled for this application once billing has been enabled in the admin console. but as i said it was already enabled. so i deployed it to another projec

Re: [google-appengine] Re: application logging when using 'gcloud preview app run' in Java

On 8/19/15 8:51 PM, Matt Self wrote: Hooray, I found a log location. Tucked away in the safe_process.py debug output. By starting the with gcloud with a verbosity of debug (i.e. gcloud preview app run ./app.yaml --verbosity debug) it shows a setting of APP_ENGINE_LOG_CONFIG_PATTERN which indic

Re: [google-appengine] Managed VM and logging with gcloud-maven-plugin

On 6/11/15 8:24 AM, 'Les Vogel' via Google App Engine wrote: One last try, you had it in your email, /home/vmagent/appengine-java-vmruntime/webapps/root/WEB-INF/logging.properties value="/home/vmagent/appengine-java-vmruntime/webapps/root/WEB-INF/logging.properties"/> If the full path does