At least that's the route I'll have to take for my free users. Before
concurrent Python 2.7 releases. Or before I move to Node.js on micro
EC2 with SimpleDB: one year of this configuration costs the same as
one instance running 2mo on GAE.
Angke
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, GAEfan
devices as a way of
communication between these mobile devices. I wanted to provide the
paid users with prompt response while keep the free users waiting.
Please suggest a way of doing this if possible.
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Angke Chen wrote:
>>
>&
Yeah I'm moving away as well to node.js on AWS.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Raymond C. wrote:
> I used to recommend every developers around to use GAE because its the best
> cloud platform by design. Now i truly feel sorry to all of them and telling
> them I am quitting all Google's product.
If all you said is true, then why the billing in the preview was so
cheap for 3 years?
BAIT AND SWITCH I call.
Angke
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Wesley C (Google) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Srirangan wrote:
>>
>> The mode of operation seems to be:
>>
Yet you charge us heavily before all those functions are present. Now
I can't treat my own paid/unpaid users separately. Everyone of my
users will suffer from a degrade of service because I can't afford so
many instances.
Good job Google.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Gregory D'alesandre wrote
Can we do it? I mean it was in Preview when it was cheap.
Angke
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:18 AM, zdravko wrote:
> Why not and especially in America ?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
>
OMG great post!
+1984
On Sep 1, 9:06 am, Santiago Lema wrote:
> I detailed on my blog how using simplificative optimization can
> compensate for the unbelievable price increase. As you can see there
> wasn't any good reason to worry.
>
> As usual we developers were stupid and Google in its almig
+1984
On Sep 1, 9:28 am, bFlood wrote:
> +100
>
> On Sep 1, 12:23 pm, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
>
>
>
> > i assume you guys must be getting some serious
> > pressure from upper management to start making
> > some money here.
>
> > but asking us to:
>
> > (1) convert to HR to get the SLA and
>
>
I guess we all need to have the balls to say "fuck this shit, I'm out
of here."
I mean, at least 100% percent price increase? Concurrent won't be
ready a few months after the price change?
Quote Eric Cartman: "Screw you guys, I'm going home~"
On Aug 31, 10:19 pm, GR wrote:
> Surprised to read t
Wow they really did this? Now I'm burnt. I won't deploy future apps on
App Engine and will slowly migrate the current ones away. This whole
thing is ridiculous. They could totally offer BestBuy $1 monthly
bills while charging us $60s.
On Aug 31, 7:14 pm, John Wheeler wrote:
> Also, bums me ou
Thanks, this solved my problem too.
Just note that App Engine Launcher doesn't seem to use the default
system python, my default python is python2.5, but had to go to app
engine launcher's settings to force it to use python2.5, otherwise it
throws _ctype error.
Just my two cents
On Sep 5, 3:44
11 matches
Mail list logo
