Will the 1Mb API call limit be lifted soon? We now have billing (for
sizing up total storage) and 10Mb request/response limit... I believe
that the 1Mb API call limit should soon be raised to at least 10Mb.
Does anybody know if that will happen anytime soon???
Thanx
--~--~-~--~~--
is this gae limitation going to be lifted for paying customers? if not
gae is going to be useless for lots of scenarios!
On Nov 8, 9:27 am, Aral Balkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> > python variables are limited to 1Mb anyway, so the urlfetch wouldnt be
> > able to return bigger fil
Take a look at
http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/docs/AuthForInstalledApps.html#ClientLogin
I believe that the service code for appengine is "ah".
Dado
On Nov 6, 9:23 am, OI2engine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am developing an iphone app which is
Well, I now understand why the 1MB size limit is there in the first
place. Not being able to store binary content larger than 1MB is a
huge limitation. Perhaps Text/Blob properties ought to be lazily
loaded to raise that limit. I have actually been wondering whether the
"service for storing and se
be in the
form of a new property type (e.g., FileProperty) or (preferred by me)
a BlobProperty without the current 1MB size limit???
Thanx,
Dado
On Oct 23, 4:45 pm, "Marzia Niccolai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many of you have expressed interest in learning abo
Are Text and Blob model properties lazily loaded? Id est, when I query
for 100 entities each containing ~1MB worth of data in a blob
property, am I moving 100MB of data across google's wires?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Are Text and Blob model properties lazily loaded? Id est, when I query
for hundreds of entities each containing ~1MB worth of data in a blob
property, am I moving 100MB of data across google's wires?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are su
gt; On Nov 5, 1:13 pm, Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Shoot! How about file upload time then... I can always store the data
> > on S3, but if GAE quits on a request that takes a long time because of
> > large file size (I am thinking in the range 1-10Mb) then it is p
Shoot! How about file upload time then... I can always store the data
on S3, but if GAE quits on a request that takes a long time because of
large file size (I am thinking in the range 1-10Mb) then it is pretty
useless for what I would like to do.
Thanx,
Dado
On Nov 5, 9:45 am, Jeff S <[EM
/response cycle cannot last longer than
a few seconds?
Thnx,
Dado
On Nov 2, 2:20 pm, cm_gui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi All
>
> We want to implement our company Intranet (currently using XOOPS) on
> Google Apps Sites (we are a Google Apps Premier customer).
>
> We have
r,collection_name='all_my_points')
>
> this lets me call customer.all_my_points, which returns an array of
> the point objects that are linked to that customer.
>
> The full scoop is
> herehttp://code.google.com/appengine/docs/datastore/entitiesandmodels.htm...
>
>
gt; I don't understand very much about __metaclass__ processing, so there
> may be some way to define a metaclass for Book (probably involving a
> modified version of db.ReferenceProperty) that does provide this
> checking. However, I'd be surprised if there was.
>
> On
ject, and binds that object to a variable,
> creating that variable if necessary.
>
> Python's executable objects can contain references to undefined
> things. However, some of the db.Model transformations for
> db.ReferenceProperties depend on the specified reference_class (
in model inside methods that use it, but it feels like a non-
efficient hack to me.
One question though. Is it right that the example shown in the first
post doesn't work because, the way Python "imports", Page doesn't yet
exists when referenced by Book?
Dado
On Oct 15, 5:47
I am having the same problem when defining a join model between two
models... because they "depend" on each other, but in my case is a
problem related to how Python "imports" classes (I am using "import"
to pull in models definitions that are in different files). Does the
code that you posted all
The docs point to the following (current) limitations:
Storage per App: 500MB
Files per App: 1,000
Size per File: 1MB
I would like to launch a personal storage application, where file
content is stored inside a BlobProperty.
Beside the current limitations (which I hope will be lifted in the
ver
> The other point was that the issue tracker is closely monitored so
> make your desires known there... (star your most important issues)
Filed and starred a bunch of issues there!!!
:)
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
ore capacity by the end of the year"
> (slightly paraphrased)
>
> and that is the the only prediction they would make. :)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All we really need is an approx date... 1 month, 3 months
It's easy to do that, I agree... indeed that's what I am doing. But it
seems NONSENSE (see Wooble reply above ;) and an unnecessary hassle if
we only knew an approx date for paid accounts (and binaryproperty size
limits, etc).
On Sep 18, 9:21 am, cb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's pretty easy t
opers are very active in this group
> in helping people resolve specific problems with their code. The fact
> that they're ignoring your demands to reveal their trade secrets
> doesn't mean they're not reading them.
>
> On Sep 18, 1:32 am, Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1... I actually would be happy with even a NOT firm date... but don't
hold your breath! It doesn't look like may GAE team people are really
paying attention to this group.
On Sep 17, 6:44 am, FreeAgent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to the GAE team!
>
> I've been a fan of App Engine since la
erhaps
> someone else could watch and confirm?
>
> On Sep 10, 10:05 am, Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any (event the slightest) idea when free account limits will be lifted
> > and we will be able to pay for storage etc?
>
> > Some of us have been deve
Any (event the slightest) idea when free account limits will be lifted
and we will be able to pay for storage etc?
Some of us have been developing apps for GAE since the very beginning
and would like to launch them for real... without the current
limitations on storage, file uploads, etc. The lim
I also agree completely!!! Lack of roadmap and GAE team feedback is a
very serious issue!!!
On Aug 27, 3:09 pm, javaDinosaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am starting to have doubts about continuing to develop my
> applications for GAE. My concerns are not technical although I have a
> some anxi
I just wrote my own User model and authenticate using wsse +
session_id cookie
On Aug 27, 6:36 am, hamdiakoguz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I implement a custom user authentication system. I don't want
> to use Users API for some reason. What approach i must take or where
> can i get info
25 matches
Mail list logo
