[google-appengine] Re: Static files in newly deployed version not available in the apps domain. (Major problem)

2010-06-03 Thread Donovan
ng the build process before uploading to appengine . You could do the same thing for the python as well, but the URL mapping feature is so easy to use I've never wanted to do so. - Donovan On Jun 3, 2:32 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote: > Tim, > > As a general rule, web develope

[google-appengine] Re: url rewriting for static content

2010-06-12 Thread Donovan
ine/issues/detail?id=2070 - donovan On Jun 12, 1:44 pm, George Moschovitis wrote: > Is it possible to apply url rewriting rules to static content? > Example mappings: > > http://sub.myapp.com/*->http://www.myapp.com/sub/*http://www.myapp.com/**/*->http://www.myapp.com/**/*.html

[google-appengine] Re: Disable gzip encoding

2010-07-27 Thread Donovan
They're making the request for a SWF file from another SWF file, they stated that they did not see a way to change the Accept header for that request. What they're really asking to do is to disable gzip compress for the SWF mimetype (which to me seems odd that google would be doing, since just like

[google-appengine] Re: unterminated string literal

2008-09-09 Thread Donovan
Unless there's already a function in python that I don't know about (I know php has json_encode), you can goto json.org to get a python based json library. It will properly escape string values for you (note that it'll include the quotes) so that you can output them into javascript in your templat

[google-appengine] Re: Using datastore for up to 4.5 billion keys

2010-12-18 Thread Donovan
ad. Do you have any thought on this? Thanks again for your great answer! Cheers, Donovan. On Dec 18, 7:39 pm, Robert Kluin wrote: > Hi Donovan, >   It sounds to me like the hash should be used as the key.  I would > probably use a structure something like this: > > class Docum

[google-appengine] Cost of Datastore CPU usage seems high

2011-01-06 Thread Donovan
any ideas for minimizing the datastore CPU usage? My hunch is that the datastore CPU usage is a bit overpriced :( Cheers, Donovan. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng.

[google-appengine] Re: Google Docs rejects queries from app engine

2011-02-04 Thread Donovan
Many of the Google APIs allow you to send a client IP as a parameter now. This helps them better determine what requests are generated by end user interaction vs. automated queries. If the API you're using supports this, I would highly suggest you use it - it should help alleviate false positives.

[google-appengine] Sending Database to Datastore

2013-04-22 Thread Sean Donovan
Hey Googlers, First time poster here. I've been messing with this for hours, and I'm thinking it must be the simplest thing to do if you're slow like myself. I'm trying to get into Google App Engine, so I've picked up a small task from a friend as a way to get my feet wet. He's put together an

[google-appengine] Using datastore for up to 4.5 billion keys

2010-12-18 Thread Donovan Hide
could give me some advice or tips on how this might perform on AppEngine in terms of query performance, cost and minimizing metadata/index overhead. It sounds like 4.5 billion*metadata storage could be the killer. Cheers, Donovan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [google-appengine] Using datastore for up to 4.5 billion keys

2010-12-18 Thread Donovan Hide
Hi, it's not public yet, but the purpose of the application is the exact comparison of large corpora. Cheers, Donovan. On 18 December 2010 13:56, supercobra wrote: > Just curious, what is this huge database about? Can we check it online? > > -- superco...@gm

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Using datastore for up to 4.5 billion keys

2010-12-18 Thread Donovan Hide
biggest user of space! Well, I'll give it a go and have a look at the AppStats and will report an answer... Cheers, Donovan On 18 December 2010 22:55, Robert Kluin wrote: > Hey Donovan, >   Some inline comments follow. > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 15:06, Donovan wrote: >&

[google-appengine] Re: Cost of Datastore CPU usage seems high

2011-01-06 Thread Donovan Hide
ent_id not in indexes[i].v: indexes[i].v.append(document_id) upserts.append(indexes[i]) db.put(upserts) On 6 January 2011 19:36, Donovan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using a very simple model to store arrays of document ids for an > inverted index based on 3 million docu

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Cost of Datastore CPU usage seems high

2011-01-19 Thread Donovan Hide
doing what you're doing. > Thanks for additional info. > Hope that helps! I though relation index entites might help, but they're currently too slow for big queries https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine-python/t4vBnMH5J4M/discussion Cheers, Donovan. > On Thu,

Re: RE: [google-appengine] GAE and own domain

2011-04-05 Thread brett donovan
It might be quick without the domain issues...was fine before attempting to hook up the domain. I'm not having much luck with domain records at all..still my domain is not resolving to the app. On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > Typically it takes us about 8 minutes to g

[google-appengine] GAE points to Google Adsense for Domains

2011-04-05 Thread brett donovan
I previously had a domain parked. I have now attmpted to point this domain at the app, however it still points to the domain parking page. I have google apps set-up, but I cannot seem to find a smart way to problem solve this MX and CNAME records are set. Any ideas? -- You received this mes