Hi all,
I'm seeing different docs about billing for incoming bandwith:
Incoming bandwith is not present in the pricing table:
http://code.google.com/intl/nl-NL/appengine/docs/billing.html
However,
http://code.google.com/intl/nl-NL/appengine/docs/quotas.html
mentions that Incoming bandwith is
Hi,
I have to verify my google app account again, even though I all ready
registered. I also created some applications allready!
Can someone from google please activate my account?
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Hi Nick,
I'm using the url you've specified. It shows my two applications I allready
registered. When I click "Create an Application", I'm being redirected to
http://appengine.google.com/permissions/smssend.
Jaap
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) <
nick.john...@google.com> wr
Terry,
Thanks, I've found some other resources, but this is a usefull one!
Jaap
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, nolybab wrote:
>
> Jaap,
>
> See if this link has what you need:
>
> http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Building_an_OpenSocial_App_with_Google_App_Engine#Sending_and_verifyin
If you don't mind, please share any other resources you may have that
> might be useful on this topic :)
>
> Thanks,
> Terry
>
> On Jul 27, 10:07 am, Jaap Taal wrote:
> > Terry,
> > Thanks, I've found some other resources, but this is a usefull one!
> >
&
+1
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:00 AM, someone1 wrote:
>
> hahahaha, i laughed so hard after reading how Nick repeatedly gave the
> same reply to everyone. I think Nick will no longer be activating
> accounts as there is a online form which he has linked to many times
> above.
>
> :D
>
> On Jul 30,
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1924
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Millton wrote:
>
> the issue has been tracked with ID 1924, thanks
>
> On 7月30日, 下午5时08分, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
> wrote:
> > Hi Millton,
> >
> > Can you please file a bug in the issue tracker for t
eys or does app engine take care of this...
**
Jaap Taal
[ Q42 BV | tel 070 44523 42 | direct 070 44523 65 | http://q42.nl |
Waldorpstraat 17F, Den Haag | KvK 30164662 ]
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:52 PM, bFlood wrote:
>
> hey nick
>
> is there any optimized way to have a python
Hi Rodrigo,
You'll have to install django 1.0 your self. This is quit easy if you use
easy_install.
Jaap
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Rodrigo wrote:
>
> When do you guys are going to add to the SDK the new version of
> Django?.
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
I've experienced a similar problem running on the SDK.aplying two filter()s
result in 0 records found. Aplying either one of the filter()s and comparing
the resultsets found a record that matches both filter()s.
Jaap Taal
[ Q42 BV | tel 070 44523 42 | direct 070 44523 65 | http://q
Same here, just good old ASCII chars in that record.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:55 AM, phtq wrote:
>
> The fact that the record can be retrieved with any 2 of the 3 filters
> indicates that there are no hidden characters.
>
> On Aug 5, 8:41 am, Wooble wrote:
> > Are you sure there isn't a space
come up with any explanation in your case so
> far either?
>
> On Aug 5, 11:18 pm, Jaap Taal wrote:
> > Same here, just good old ASCII chars in that record.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:55 AM, phtq wrote:
> >
> > > The fact th
Nick,
If I'm not mistaken:
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'contains'Should be:
os.environ['SERVER_SOFTWARE'].find('Development') >= 0
your comment was helpful, though
Jaap
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Mark Jones wrote:
>
> I also discovered this today:
>
> http://code.googl
Every time dev_appserver starts up it checks for a new version of the
SDK Checking
for updates to the SDK
Yesterday the SDK was updated to 1.2.4
There's no --version flag to either dev_appserver or appcfg and the VERSION
file still mentions 1.2.3
I think dev_appserver should output SDK version if
Guys,
If you want to have prefix searches, you might want to google for:
whoosh app engine. Whoosh is a lucene like indexer in pure python. Someone
has created a app engine component.
Haven't done a lot with it, but it works quite OK.
Jaap
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Wooble wrote:
>
>
>
> O
Hi Nick,
You say: "The same Python runtime environment can be used by multiple
handlers - in which case they will share the same loaded modules."
Is this always the case? Or do you need to programmatically do this? If so,
how do you achieve that?
Jaap
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Nick Johns
You should post your question on:
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Apps
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dickster wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if Google Apps Dashboard is covered by the Google Apps
> Engine discussion group, but since I couldn't find a separate group
> for it, I'm postin
I think the app engine engineers should write a detailed book about app
engine, or is there a good book about app engine's details on the market?
Jaap
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Devel63 wrote:
>
> I've watched this video, so I watched again. At first he says he
> thinks filter order might
Use google code.
Jaap
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, arpit wrote:
>
> I have just started with GAE and one of the things I'd like to do is
> deploy something like Trac or RedMine to track the project we are
> working on. Unfortunately Trac doesnt work on GAE since it needs MySQL
> or similar
The update check is a little bit behind, I've noticed that with the previous
release too.
Jaap
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Mr. Rajiv Bakulesh Shah
wrote:
>
> Hi, guys.
>
> I'm running the App Engine SDK version 1.2.4 on OS X Snow Leopard. I
> just saw on Twitter that version 1.2.5 has been r
to GAE
> first, until eventually the whole app runs on GAE.
>
>
>
> I have done this with several of my installs… and find even getting 75%
> running on GAE can help my scalability.
>
>
>
> *From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> google-appeng...@googl
Both suggestions don't work.
Jaap
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Matthew Blain wrote:
>
> Consider using -a 0.0.0.0 on the dev_appserver commandline. This will
> bind to ports other than localhost.
> You may be able to get fiddler to proxy 127.0.0.1 but it's probably
> easier to use your own ma
Does anyone from google have anything to say about the development server? I
just don't want my browser to reload a file which hasn't changed. Every
webserver supports this!
Jaap
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Devel63 wrote:
>
> If you don't want to turn off IPv6, referencing your local server
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2203
Jaap
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) <
nick.john...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi jaap,
> Can you please file a bug for this in the issue tracker?
>
> -Nick Johnson
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:32 PM, j...@q42.nl wr
24 matches
Mail list logo
