The correct URL for version 7 would be http://7.latest.wordwisegame.appspot.com/
On Jun 8, 7:17 pm, Philip Tucker wrote:
> I'm hitting version 7 of my server athttp://7.wordwisegame.appspot.com
> right now, but no logs are showing in the console. I do see logs on
> the default version (6). I've n
Check this tip by Ikai Lan:
http://ikaisays.com/2010/07/12/google-app-engine-tips-and-tricks-prebuilding-indexes-using-a-non-default-version/
On Jul 21, 11:40 am, GeekTantra wrote:
> I am trying to segregate the queries that require indexes by using a
> try except block like following
>
> try:
Look here:
http://www.kyle-jensen.com/increase-email-deliverability-on-appengine-by
It seems that the correct SPF record to use is actually:
v=spf1 include:aspmx.googlemail.com ~all
On Jul 29, 4:20 am, Greg wrote:
> I'm having the same problem. I have SPF records set up, and I'm pro-
> activel
Why not simply initialize a JS variable in the page HTML for logged-in
users, and then simply checking for it? There's no security
vulnerability in doing that, as any part of the client-side code can
be manipulated anyway.
On Jul 30, 10:13 pm, Jeff Schwartz wrote:
> I think that for security reas
Hi Google team,
I know the Channel API is not yet official, but a lot of its code is
openly visible and I've already been playing with it. There are a
couple of questions which I'd like to ask before fully committing to
it. They are related to the high-level intended usage patterns for the
API.
F
Moishe, thanks very much for the detailed answers! I think your design
choices are fine, there is only one small suggestion I'd like to make:
> Connection info for channels (re: your first question) probably won't
> make the cut for the first release of the API, but it is something I
> want to do.
Ping times are almost irrelevant with GAE static files. Most of the
time is spent not reaching the Google HTTP frontend servers, but
waiting for them to reply. You can easily see that with Firebug or
Chrome.
On Sep 1, 12:55 am, Matt H wrote:
> http://just-ping.com/
>
> On Aug 31, 9:33 am, Pieter
I usually go with just:
uuid.uuid4().hex
I'm not 100% sure whether it uses /dev/urandom, or something GAE-
specific. I'm fairly confident it doesn't rely on the Mersenne Twister
though.
On Apr 3, 7:21 pm, Ulrich wrote:
> Or is it better to use something like:
> random = random.SystemRandom()
>
Dan, are there any plans to eventually support client-side BOSH
(a.k.a. HTTP-binding for XMPP)? Server-side XMPP support is not very
useful, but client-side BOSH support would be great.
On Feb 9, 7:56 pm, Dan Sanderson wrote:
> XMPP support will not take the form of long running processes. XMPP
