Totally agree. New billing is too complicated to control and too expensive
when you don't do it. Old billing wasn't and it's low cost in absolute
wash't the reason.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on
Maybe Google is in its right business mind? What should they let CPU be idle
for if they can make customers use it and pay many times its cost price?
четверг, 14 июля 2011 г. 19:08:50 UTC+4 пользователь Adam Sah написал:
Greg/Guido/etc. - why isn't gae/python using cPickle? security? seems
I wrote rather negative post about future changes yesterday and it was not
shown yet. It seems messages are moderated and you should not expect to see
many other who do not agree.
пятница, 8 июля 2011 г. 17:39:18 UTC+4 пользователь Tim написал:
** TL;DR alert **
I was going to send the
First of all, I must say that I agree with almost all the negative
said about new pricing policy in this thread (maybe except the PHP
thing - I don't think PHP would attrat by a lot of mature paying
developers, I think it's the opposite). Even though I understand
Google makes money, not charity, I
My Google Account itself is rather old and I didn't know there was manual
premoderation for new Group Members. My apologies.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:41 PM, an0nym an0nym...@gmail.com wrote:
= instance hours vs ram hours =
I don't think this request for so-called ram-hours makes much sense.
I'm willing to bet that when a GAE instance starts up on a box, a
fixed amount of RAM (the max it could use, say 128MB
