I have a queue with 11 tasks in them which are not run, for some
unknown reason. The same tasks added again ran just fine, so the
stalled ones are obsolete. Could someone from Google just delete them?
The app id is "bicingstats"
Thanks,
Benjamin
--
You received this message because you are subsc
See my post on the exact same topic earlier today, too...
On May 5, 10:21 am, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My app at alsmicdk.appspot.com has been getting the following error:
>
> Request was aborted after waiting too long to attempt to service your
> request. This may happen sporadically when
I also get the same error with cron jobs in another app of mine. This
has only started happening recently. Can someone @ Google please take
a look at this?
On May 5, 10:18 am, Benjamin Schuster-Böckler
wrote:
> I'm getting loads of these. It's ok with the deferred tasks, as they are
> reschedule
ter is under unexpectedly high or uneven load. If you see this
> >> message frequently, please contact the App Engine team."
>
> >> This started after my app had been up and running for months, with no
> >> changes; worked the day before, then dead.
>
> >> N
I already have 6 apps so far, but when I tried to create a new app
today I was told to activate my account through SMS again. Luckily, I
have a spare mobile, so I activated through this other number. Now, I
tried to add a new app, but whatever I use as the identifier, it tells
me it's not valid. I
Purely for academic reasons, I'd like to point out that the
computationally efficient way to find exact substrings (ie "cat" in
"merecats") is a Suffix Tree: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix_tree
You could probably (with a lot of time and mental strength) create a
suffix tree system using the G
I think I read in some thread on this forum that HTTP Basic
Authentication is possible somehow with GAE. Is this correct? If yes,
how to do that? I have a very simple webservice backend for an iPhone
app which I would like to protect from unintended access, so HTTP
Basic Authentication would be by
I have the following code:
entities = db.GqlQuery("SELECT __key__ FROM mymodel").fetch(300)
keys = {}
while entities:
for key in entities:
if key in keys.keys():
keys[key] = keys[key] + 1
else:
keys[key] = 1
entities = db.GqlQuery("SELECT __key__ FRO
.myId] = 1
entities = mymodel.all().order('myId').filter('myId >', entities
[-1].myId).fetch(300)
So why does the key-based query not work?
On Nov 15, 3:08 pm, bsb wrote:
> I have the following code:
>
> entities = db.GqlQuery("SELECT __key__ FROM mymodel"
to complain that it needs a descending
index on key for parallel downloads.
On Nov 15, 3:28 pm, bsb wrote:
> Just to say, the following query gives me the correct result:
>
> entities = mymodel.all().order('myId').fetch(300)
> keys = {}
> while entities:
> for o
I am trying to cycle through all elements of a table via the remote
API, using a modification of the code snippet from
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/remote_api.html:
# SNIP
query =
No ideas? Noone? I just don't understand why not all keys are
retrieved every time. It doesn't make any sense...
Thanks in advance,
Ben
On Dec 8, 6:47 pm, bsb wrote:
> I am trying to cycle through all elements of a table via the remote
> API, using a modification of the code sni
silently fails.. And
> prints out its current count?
>
> On 12/10/09, bsb wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > No ideas? Noone? I just don't understand why not all keys are
> > retrieved every time. It doesn't make any sense...
>
> > Thanks in advance,
> &g
e for this
class, if that makes any difference.
Can someone from Google please look into this?
Thanks,
Ben
On Dec 11, 2:04 pm, bsb wrote:
> I doubt that, I did get some explixcit timeouts from the fetch, which
> went away when I reduced the limit from 500 to 300. So, I think if it
> was
pps[-1]" to "apps[-1].key()"
> in your query2 line.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:18 PM, bsb wrote:
> > I dug a bit deeper, as nobody seems to have a clue either. I printed
> > all keynames that I retrieved from the datastore in the order they
> &
I'm downloading data from the bulkloader using the command:
appcfg.py download_data --config_file=ExporterFormat.py --
filename=prices.csv --kind Model_price .
The command finishes without errors, but I only get 39820 entities. A
quick look into the statistics on the website tells me there are at
I know this is an old story, but I still don't get it: I have ~1M
entities, each one consists of a date, a reference and 2 ints. I have
no custom indices or anything. The datastore statistics say that I'm
using 188MB for the entities. The quota view tells me I'm using a
whooping 1GB of disk space.
is my description of the problem hard to understand?
Maybe I should just file a bug report, sigh...
Best,
Benjamin
On Dec 15, 11:24 pm, bsb wrote:
> I'm downloading data from the bulkloader using the command:
>
> appcfg.py download_data --config_file=ExporterFormat.py --
> file
r the help,
Ben
On Dec 17, 7:33 pm, Stephen wrote:
> On Dec 15, 10:24 pm, bsb wrote:
>
>
>
> > It seems that the remote api sometimes uses the wrong index, or the
> > index itself is broken. Either way, what happens is that the entity
> > keys are occasionally retu
I'm struggling a bit with this. I'm trying to bulk dump an entity in
my datastore. I get the following info:
[INFO] Model_mobileapp: No descending index on __key__, performing
serial download
Now, I added the following index:
- kind: Model_mobileapp
properties:
- name: __key__
direct
I'm afraid there's no way to delete tasks. The way I solve this in my
app is to have a QueueControl object for each task. This is checked
before the task starts. If emptyQueue == True, then the task just
finishes without processing. I can then just edit that object in the
data viewer and set empty
damentally different from classical databases. At
least that's my feeling.
Thanks again,
Ben
On Oct 19, 3:02 pm, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:14 PM, bsb wrote:
>
> > I'm struggling a bit with this. I'm trying
n on
> the admin page.
> Would be cool for all other entities in the datastore as well ;-)
>
> On 19 Okt., 12:29, bsb wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm afraid there's no way to delete tasks. The way I solve this in my
> > app is to have a QueueControl object for each
23 matches
Mail list logo
