that will at some point in the future call some other
endpoint from the same api living on the same instance. Perhaps this is a
bit convoluted but I am wondering if this is possible.
Any guidance or input is much appreciated. Thank you!
Best,
Colin
--
You received this message because you are
I tried both 1.8.7 and 1.8.8
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:26:54 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Colin Su
> > wrote:
>
>> I encountered a problem recently, and it will let us couldn't testing our
>> Endpoints API locally, but
I encountered a problem recently, and it will let us couldn't testing our
Endpoints API locally, but production is still okay.
We didn't change any code at that time (maybe), but it just become not
working anymore.
The problem is while I'm accessing endpoints API with authentication by
OAuth2
d do
if you don't need to.
I disagree that 'make it idempotent' is a sufficient answer to this
question. It is reasonable to want to understand the constraints of the task
queue and make implementation decisions on that basis. Cheers,
Colin
*
*
*
*
--
You received this messa
Thanks Greg - would it be a future possibility to configure the queue
algorithm not to do this (on a per-queue basis)? Obviously the low latency
heuristic is a good one in most situations, but an app developer might be
prepared to wear a slight variation in latency to get guaranteed
serialisati
aviour but thought
I'd check. Would be an excellent feature. Cheers,
Colin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this gro
Thanks guys - that helps a lot. Cheers,
Colin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengin
27;s already got
something that's suitable (for my use case)?' If its good enough for
google...
Cheers,
Colin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@goog
ea for managing arbitrary
counters?
3. Is there any way to reset the counter for a kind? Or to set it to an
arbitrary value? Obviously doing so would result in key collisions if I was
using it normally, but the datastore knows how to handle that error state.
Cheers,
Colin
--
You received
Perhaps this post will help -
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-and-google-app-engine-td64871.html,
I seem to remember something about those libraries requiring some unexpected
stuff that interfered with Java security policies, but the memory is pretty
faint - a quick
They do take a while - there appears to be a really long queue before the
queue indicated there. A couple of hours in the state you have shown there
is not uncommon, although they have been getting better recently. So if you
have some critical functionality to deploy that needs a new index, you
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3203543/how-to-make-persistent-a-python-dictionary-on-google-appengine/3203672#3203672
I'm still pretty convinced my answer was the best - especially since it
borrows nick johnson's code :) Cheers,
Colin
--
You received this message becau
Great news! And thanks Ben and Barry. I like method 2 also (it's
associated with Google's enhanced security policy). OK, then, back to
slicing and cloud-aware printers :-)
colin
On Sep 11, 11:36 pm, Ben wrote:
> Colin, what you are describing can definitley be done in the free
&
m/appengine/docs/quotas.html
>
> On 11 September 2010 18:41, colin wrote:
>
> > Thanks but I don't want a google apps domain (had to find out what it
> > was). I am slightly confused - sorry. Here's my original post:
>
> > Some years ago "I wrote a wo
six tables and maybe 2000 records among all of them. I want
to put it in a cloud and look forward to learning Python. In the
future maybe three users in different citties will access the on-line
version."
I am willing to pay max $12 a year for each user if Google hosts this.
Do you know of an
ot; wrote:
> Yes, only users on your Google Apps domain will be able to use a GAE4B
> application. You won't be able to open it up to general @gmail.com, OpenID
> users, or use your own authorization system.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:29 AM, colin wrote:
> &
ng service anyone can use.
>
> Google App Engine for Business
>
> You create an expense reporting tool that you want tied to a specific Google
> Apps Domain, say, ikaicorp.com that only us...@ikaicorp.com can use. This
> application can be administered via the ikaicorp.com domain con
I am confused by the two pricing policies (app engine for business and
app engine).
I have a small business. I wrote a workflow, invoicing and payment
tracking software using MS Access and VB. It gets accessed about once
a day. It has about six tables and maybe 2000 records among all of
them. I wa
pricelist like?
Colin
On Sep 8, 12:17 pm, Julian Namaro wrote:
> After a lot of work, and quite a bit of testing, I am happy today to
> present you my app.
> It's called memobuild, and it's basically an editor for large online
> documents (e.g. documentation, reports, e-
My memcache stats, expire time is 48h, non of the itemd are older than
5h, but often items that should be in the cache aren't there:
- items: 8423
- bytes: 10655912
I (wrongly) assumed that i hit the size limit once i had 25mb of data
in memcache, i optimized (compressed and pickled data before p
20 matches
Mail list logo
