Join us at 18.15 for a 18.30 start prompt!
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:07:01 PM UTC+1, Theo wrote:
>
> Tonight at Skills Matter, London, we have a very exciting talk by Johan
> Euphrosine joining us from Zurich.
>
> Learn how to optimize your app to increase your reliability
Tonight at Skills Matter, London, we have a very exciting talk by Johan
Euphrosine joining us from Zurich.
Learn how to optimize your app to increase your reliability, increase your
performance, and reduce your costs.
Plus learn how to use GO with Google App Engine and pose your questions to
Tonight at Skills Matter, London, we have a very exciting talk by Johan
Euphrosine joining us from Zurich.
Learn how to optimize your app to increase your reliability, increase your
performance, and reduce your costs. Plus, pose your questions to a leading
google developer in the App Engine te
I use django-helper, so this may or may not be relevant to you. The
URL Dispatcher in Django matches regular expressions, so something
like ^/debug/.*$ should do the trick.
On Nov 11, 1:57 pm, jago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I define the apps_binding in such a way that all GETs to
>
> /deb
Ok, but that doesn't answer the fundamental quastion.
Does this work:
posts = []
for post in Post.gql('')
posts.append(post)
db.delete(posts)
On Oct 20, 6:33 am, Ross Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a very quick question that I was not able to decide by
It's easy. Just keep on calling .fetch(1000, 1000 * n) where n gets
incremented every time
On Oct 2, 6:42 pm, Tony Arkles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real goal is to figure out how *not* to do that. :)
>
> What are you trying to accomplish?
>
> On Oct 2, 6:15 pm, "Venkatesh Rangarajan"
>
>
They are supposed to be unique. I have managed to make duplicate id's
though. Keys are always unique, as far as I can tell.
On Oct 1, 9:31 am, ae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just wondering, do the datastore key ids get recycled for an entity?
> or are they guaranteed to by unique for a
I'd like to second this, and perhaps offer a bit of clarification.
I've been involved in a project for some time now (I've been a user
from the very beginning), and I've been constantly frustrated with
some of the features of App Engine. In some ways, it's been amazing.
The fact that one is cons
You could change db.ReferenceProperty to db.ListProperty(db.Key) and
only ever put one item in the list.
Alternatively, you could store the key in a string and just db.Key()
it every time.
On Sep 26, 2:03 pm, "Chris Marasti-Georg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is there a way to get the key (or id
Thanks a ton.
On Sep 24, 8:57 am, "Marzia Niccolai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have moved these indexes in to the 'Error' state, you should now be able
> to vacuum and re-upload them.
>
> -Marzia
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:29 AM
I just ran into Bug 543. Now my indexes are stuck (it looks
permenant). I know there is a fix in the works, but would it be
possible for someone to unstick me?
my app_id is concurrr (3 r's)
Thanks so much.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
see http://shell.appspot.com
On Sep 5, 10:35 am, windchess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anybody heard if Google is planning on creating an online
> development environment for GAE ?
>
> It would make it really easy to get started using GAE without having
> to download and install anything on
are you using memcache.delete at all?
On Sep 4, 6:45 pm, t0ny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to use memcache and it seems to be working on my dev
> server. I'm caching three thing and only two of them stay cached. Here
> is my code. mcount is the one thats not working.
>
> #this work
13 matches
Mail list logo
