Hmm, my yesterdays post regarding the new pricing hasn't been publish, strange.
Hi Google, how would it be if you would provide a package based pricing as alternative. It could look like: - Free like package S or M for non-commercial projects, - Package S with one non always-on instance, 1 GB database etc. - Package M with one always-on instance, 2 GB database etc. - Package L with two always-on instances, 5 GB database etc. - Package XL with four always-on instances, 10 GB database etc. - Unlimited like your new pricing model Together with fair prices it would make the calculation by far more simple. Additionally there should be notifications when a limit will be reached seen and the switching between packages should be pretty simple. The current complexity makes it hard to decide for the platform. I would like to implement two application, it least one will be non-commercial. I already started development in Go. But with the current pricing I don't know which costs I've got to expect, it's very hard. And the lock-in to the API doesn't make this decision easier. At least a clear pricing would help. mue -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/XaqZgTicfvQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
