Re: [google-appengine] Datastore question

2011-12-12 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
You may also have a slight misconception - the write limit applies to each individual entity, not the entity as a class.  So you can only update Thing1 once per second, but you can also update Thing2 once per second, etc.  You should have no problem being able to handle creation of lots of same

[google-appengine] Datastore question

2011-12-11 Thread Andrew Romanov
I am thinking of using Google App Engine for next web application, but have some concerns about Datastore (High Replication Datastore). In video explaining High Replication Datastore they told that writes take some time (45 ms). As I understand that means that many users won't be able to update

RE: [google-appengine] Datastore question

2011-12-11 Thread Brandon Wirtz
Of Andrew Romanov Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 9:40 PM To: Google App Engine Subject: [google-appengine] Datastore question I am thinking of using Google App Engine for next web application, but have some concerns about Datastore (High Replication Datastore). In video explaining High Replication

[google-appengine] Datastore question

2009-09-02 Thread Ajay Chitre
Hello, I am a newbie to Datastore. Here's what I am trying to accomplish: Trying to set an Unowned one-to-many relationship between 2 objects. (I chose unowned because I wasn't sure if I could have an owned many-to-many. Also wasn't sure if lazy loading is available for the children. Is owned

[google-appengine] datastore question: Tags as expando dynamic properties or use a list?

2009-08-28 Thread Doug
Hi, I'm very new to GAE and was curous if there is a performance penalty with regards to queries and exploding indices, etc. etc... if one implements tags (a list of category names for a record if you will) as dynamic properties vs. just listdb.Category. As a dynamic property I was thinking a

[google-appengine] Datastore Question

2009-04-12 Thread Paul Kinlan
Hi Guys, My app is Twitterautofollow. I have a question about the quota, basically my app was serving between 6-13 requests a second and jumped up to 32 requests per-second and subsequently went over the quota. I am not sure where the 32 requests a second are comming from although some of them