Great, thanks again Nick!
On 10 March 2010 23:47, Nick Johnson (Google) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Nickolas Daskalou wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply. I've got a few question below that I'm hoping you
>> can answer.
>>
>> On 10 March 2010 22:10, Nick Johnson (Googl
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Nickolas Daskalou wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I've got a few question below that I'm hoping you can
> answer.
>
> On 10 March 2010 22:10, Nick Johnson (Google) wrote:
>
>> Hi Nickolas,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Nickolas Daskalou wrote
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the reply. I've got a few question below that I'm hoping you can
answer.
On 10 March 2010 22:10, Nick Johnson (Google) wrote:
> Hi Nickolas,
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Nickolas Daskalou wrote:
>
>> I remember reading a thread not long ago (
>> http://groups.google.
Hi Nickolas,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Nickolas Daskalou wrote:
> I remember reading a thread not long ago (
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/f69fe7dc4a9bc2ec)
> about how put()'ing entities with near-sequential key names or IDs could
> result in Data
I remember reading a thread not long ago (
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/f69fe7dc4a9bc2ec)
about how put()'ing entities with near-sequential key names or IDs could
result in Datastore contention, since those entities would most likely be
saved on the same Bigt
