Hi, im planning to implement memcache on my application,
i found this link
http://code.google.com/intl/en/appengine/articles/scaling/memcache.html#related
but there arent any sample how to "Cache frequently fetched entities"
i have googled it but didnt found any sample or source to learn how to
You didn't mention which datastore API you are using. It's different
for all of them.
If you're using the low-level API (or an API based on the low-level
API), you can use this:
http://code.google.com/p/objectify-appengine/wiki/MemcacheStandalone
I don't recommend trying to roll your own. It's
thx Jeff, im using Datanucleus JDO
2011/12/14 Jeff Schnitzer
> You didn't mention which datastore API you are using. It's different
> for all of them.
>
> If you're using the low-level API (or an API based on the low-level
> API), you can use this:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/objectify-appengi
Which part do you need help on? Have you used caching before in the past?
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Leandro Rezende wrote:
> thx Jeff, im using Datanucleus JDO
>
>
> 2011/12/14 Jeff Schnitze
no i never used, im trying to learn about it to reduce the "Datastore
reading operation" from my application.
my application is small and its consuming too much quota. probably i will
need to denormalize more, but using cache i hope to save some reads
operation
2011/12/14 Ikai Lan (Google)
> Wh
any tip?
2011/12/14 Leandro Rezende
> no i never used, im trying to learn about it to reduce the "Datastore
> reading operation" from my application.
>
> my application is small and its consuming too much quota. probably i will
> need to denormalize more, but using cache i hope to save some read
so i will try to Bing it! =)
2011/12/15 Leandro Rezende
> any tip?
>
>
> 2011/12/14 Leandro Rezende
>
>> no i never used, im trying to learn about it to reduce the "Datastore
>> reading operation" from my application.
>>
>> my application is small and its consuming too much quota. probably
