Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Hey Thomas, I have confirmation from engineering that validates PK's post. Concerning Alpha enrollment, these requests are still being processed, and based on usage patterns and other criteria users are selected. Also, there is a lot of work being done to make a good migration path to the Flex e

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Hey Thomas, I have confirmation from engineering that validates PK's post. Concerning Alpha enrollment, these requests are still being processed, and based on usage patterns and other criteria users are selected. Also, there is a lot of work being done to make a good migration path to the Flex e

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Hey Thomas, I currently do not have any information to provide about the GAE SDK roadmap, but I have made an inquiry into the team that may, and they will post a reply here if they have the answers to your questions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Thanks Jordan. I’m in the beta program, however, it’ll be a while before I can use the new API for real work. I pretty much live on push-queues and the most critical feature (to me) is transactional enqueueing. I honestly have no idea how anyone could build any kind of real-world app without transa

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Jordan, I'd like to know if Google is planning to drop support for GAE SDK APIs altogether, also for Standard Environment. If so, many many developers would have to rewrite considerable parts of their code for the migration to the new REST APIs. What exactly is the problem about releasing a new

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Hey Jeff, There is currently a Client Library for PULL Task Queue , but not for PUSH or CRON tasks. You can sign up for the Alpha release of Cloud Tasks

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Jeff, I totally understand your point and hopefully Google will provide the required API in time. Objectify is a great library and I would love to continue using it, but I also want my app to be readily migrated to Flex Env when it's going GA. Thanks for giving your great work to the community!

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Just to be chime in - Objectify will eventually support the new HTTP-based API to the datastore. However, until Google has a viable HTTP-based API to the task queue that lets us transactionally enqueue tasks, I can’t use the new datastore API. And I’ll be unlikely to make a successful migration of

[google-appengine] Re: Alternative to Objectify: Catatumbo?

Hey Thomas, As neither Objectify or Catatumbo are Google supported products, and are third-party, the best place to get a migration guide is from the creators of these frameworks. Specifically I'd recommend contacting Catatumbo Support to add a easy migration guide