[google-appengine] Re: App Engine vs Amazon S3

2009-03-02 Thread julian.amaya
I've been using both for the last 8 months or so and they can work together Pricing for both services: S3 Pricing $0.150 per GB – first 50 TB / month of storage used $0.140 per GB – next 50 TB / month of storage used $0.100 per GB – all data transfer in $0.170 per GB – first 10 TB / month da

[google-appengine] Re: App Engine vs Amazon S3

2009-03-01 Thread theillustratedlife
AppEngine is way easier to use than Amazon's web services. All the admin is done for you - you just have to do the scripting. You can always use a CDN to host your media and use AppEngine to render the HTML that displays that media; however, I that's probably overkill for you. Just put your ima

[google-appengine] Re: App Engine vs Amazon S3

2009-03-01 Thread Wooble
S3 only hosts static files, so it's not going to do you much good for hosting the site itself. App Engine with S3 for file storage is probably a viable option. On Mar 1, 1:02 pm, Akshar wrote: > Hi There- > > If I am planning to host an application around images then should I > choose app engin