I am somewhat annoyed they did not start off with the smaller quotas
but it can't be helped at this point. If App Engine doesn't become
profitable Google corporate will shut it down and then we will all be
hosed.
On Feb 24, 9:12 pm, "B.J." wrote:
> I don't know that I have ever whined at an orga
"However, along with many performance improvements, we have learned
that we were overly conservative with our initial free quota
estimates. Therefore, 90 days after February 24th, 2009, we will be
reducing the free quota resources."
Bait and Switch. I guess it is legal since all you invested w
B.J. wrote:
> By my calculations, it could cost me $1000 over the next year to host
> my app that I had anticipated being hosted under the quotas. It may
> cost me nothing right now our usage is just under the daily CPU
> limits. If the traffic doesn't grow, no problem But whose goal is it
I agree except for the part about DOS attacks. As far as I can tell
they will just cost you a lot of money unless you actively detect and
block them, and even then there could be cost involved.
On Feb 25, 4:24 pm, Greg wrote:
> My feeling is that many people see GAE as free/cheap hosting. It ca
The last official word on DOS attacks, from Marzia Niccolai, back in
September last year:
"On the broader issue of denial-of-service attacks, these are an
unfortunate reality in the web world. While we don't currently offer
applications any specific protections against attacks of this nature,
thi
I'm not saying you shouldn't be complainin, because lots of us were
surprised by the new "official" quota numbers and the new accounting, but I
will say that you certainly undertook a big risk by investing in a
technology as new and raw as app engine. Given the limitations and concerns
in your ema
Agreed. As I said, "Shame on me."
On Feb 25, 10:27 pm, Josh Cronemeyer
wrote:
> I'm not saying you shouldn't be complainin, because lots of us were
> surprised by the new "official" quota numbers and the new accounting, but I
> will say that you certainly undertook a big risk by investing in a
b.j. Actually yours is exactly my point of view and I think that it's
the point of many people.
On Feb 26, 5:34 am, "B.J." wrote:
> Agreed. As I said, "Shame on me."
>
> On Feb 25, 10:27 pm, Josh Cronemeyer
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not saying you shouldn't be complainin, because lots of us were
> >
Here's my super freaky logic; one day, I said to myself:
"Gmail is free, and it is AWESOME."
There was quiet in my mind for several seconds...
Then I surmised:
"Maybe Google App Engine will do for web hosting what Gmail did for
email... it will be AWESOME!"
I thought to myself...
"I must be
Nice site ;) - Hope you make out something from it
NickMilon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubs
I could make a pretty good guess as to why it happened. Google's
major income is from advertising, and while they're not going broke
any time soon, the amount of money coming in from their advertising
has dropped significantly, and so things they could have done as loss
leaders to get more advert
Why not try AppEngine Patch, you get the best of both gae and django.
--
www.MobiTheWeb.com
Let's share the best mobile web experience.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Bennomatic wrote:
>
> I could make a pretty good guess as to why it happened. Google's
> major income is from advertising
12 matches
Mail list logo
