[google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Niklasro(.appspot)
On Mar 24, 5:41 pm, Jason Funk wrote: > Hello, >  I have an idea for a web application and am starting to do research > on the design and implementation. I ran across GAE and it seems to fit > all the requirements. I have two quick questions though: > > 1) The application will require users to e

[google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Jason Funk
> You can always sync with LAMP for a Plan B I was under the impression that code developed for GAE will only work on GAE. Sure, I could sync my code but would it run? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group,

[google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Jason Funk
> Have a look at the terms of service, especially section 10.2 > > http://code.google.com/intl/en/appengine/terms.html At the end of section 10.2 I see this: At any time prior to discontinuing the current version of the Service or upgrading to a new version of the Service, Google may, in its disc

[google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Jason Funk
Thank you Ikai, and everyone else. On Mar 25, 1:34 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote: > Yes, that is what the TOS explicitly defines. We'll continue to > support App Engine for 3 years if we ever decide to deprecate it. > Support for experimental features may be dropped in this event. > > > > On Thu, M

[google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Niklasro(.appspot)
Persistence layer is very easy sync with for instance http://code.google.com/p/approcket/ View you can keep flexible with feeds or likewise I agree it's difficult and won't replicate exactly however migrations indicate growing together a LAMP and GAE is positively technically doable keeping lucrati

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Robert Kluin
Perhaps, but not exactly with a 'LAMP' stack. Look at: http://code.google.com/p/typhoonae/ http://code.google.com/p/appscale/ Robert On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Jason Funk wrote: >> You can always sync with LAMP for a Plan B > > I was under the impression that code developed for GAE

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Stephan Hartmann
I wouldn't set Prerelease = "experimental feature" (maybe someone from Google could put some light in here). However, e.g. the blobstore and task queue APIs are currently labled as experimental. 2010/3/25 Jason Funk > > Have a look at the terms of service, especially section 10.2 > > > > http:

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Ikai L (Google)
"Experimental" features refers to features that we've explicitly marked as such. An example is Blobstore API: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/blobstore/ Note that we call out experimental status with a blue box. Off the top of my head, this includes Blobstore, Task Queues and the bulk

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Stephan Hartmann
I think what people would like to hear is that section 10.2 of the terms of use does apply to the app engine service as a whole (except the "experimental features"), although the service is currently called a "preview release". Meaning, when Google decides to discontinue the service, it will be ava

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Investigation GAE

2010-03-25 Thread Ikai L (Google)
Yes, that is what the TOS explicitly defines. We'll continue to support App Engine for 3 years if we ever decide to deprecate it. Support for experimental features may be dropped in this event. On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Stephan Hartmann wrote: > I think what people would like to hear is t