[google-appengine] Re: Java 8 console application.

2016-06-05 Thread Pavlo M
Yes, right. I'll dive deeper to Compute Engine. Thanks. On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 10:16:26 PM UTC+3, Chad Vincent wrote: > > Actually, on second thought, I think Compute Engine could actually be what > you want instead of ManagedVM. It's been a while since I dug into the > differences. > >> >>

[google-appengine] Re: Java 8 console application.

2016-06-03 Thread Chad Vincent
Actually, on second thought, I think Compute Engine could actually be what you want instead of ManagedVM. It's been a while since I dug into the differences. On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 2:14:22 PM UTC-5, Chad Vincent wrote: > > Sounds like you're looking at the AppEngine Classic documentation wh

[google-appengine] Re: Java 8 console application.

2016-06-03 Thread Chad Vincent
Sounds like you're looking at the AppEngine Classic documentation where you'll likely want the AppEngine Flexible (ManagedVM) runtimes. AppEngine Classic doesn't run Java applications, it is a Java web service (think Jetty/Tomcat). It uses a web.xml to determine which classes that extend HTTPS