Re: [google-appengine] Re: Project Sharding/Load Balancing

2014-09-06 Thread Corey Gilmore
Hi all, Yup, this is against the ToS. I did read through the ToS prior to building this but missed that sentence. Either way, still a nifty little project. There has been some discussion on this on the google-appengine-go group as well. There could be a use case for centralizing data between

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Project Sharding/Load Balancing

2014-09-06 Thread Corey Gilmore
Hi all, Yup, this is against the ToS. I did read through the ToS prior to building this but missed that sentence. Either way, still a nifty little project. There has been some discussion on this on the google-appengine-go group as well. There could be a use case for centralizing data between

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Project Sharding/Load Balancing

2014-09-06 Thread Kaan Soral
I don't care whether you vialote the tos or not, not my problem :) (I also think you can steer away from that tos term) However, If I have to comment on the project, I would say it's a huge waste of time, in my opinion :) It obviously doesn't matter if you had fun doing it It would be a much

[google-appengine] Re: Project Sharding/Load Balancing

2014-09-05 Thread Chad Vincent
An interesting thought experiment, but effectively theft. I'm not really sure if there's an ethical application for this? On Thursday, September 4, 2014 8:09:24 PM UTC-5, Corey Gilmore wrote: Hi All, I build a method for load balancing on GAE. Why?: Yes, I understand that GAE auto scales

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Project Sharding/Load Balancing

2014-09-05 Thread PK
I am not qualified to provide legal advice but I would expect you would be violating your Terms of Service by doing this. I suggest you put your creativity to work on something else!! PK http://www.gae123.com On September 5, 2014 at 12:04:55 PM, Chad Vincent (ccrvinc...@gmail.com) wrote: An

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Project Sharding/Load Balancing

2014-09-05 Thread Vinny P
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Chad Vincent ccrvinc...@gmail.com wrote: An interesting thought experiment, but effectively theft. I'm not really sure if there's an ethical application for this? As Chad and others have already mentioned, I would expect this to be against the TOS.