[google-appengine] Re: Somewhat Disappointed.

2009-03-09 Thread Joe Bowman
Server side javascript would be awesome, I have to admit. The challenges you are running into with having to use python and javascript is just the nature of the game right now in most shops. Don't forget CSS, and making sure both your CSS and javascript work across all browsers. ugh On Mar 9, 12

[google-appengine] Re: Somewhat Disappointed.

2009-03-09 Thread peterh
http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/ Pyjamas is a cross-browser Web App development API that allows you to write your client side functionality in Python. While it looks like a desktop API, Pyjamas is a stand alone Python to JavaScript compiler, an AJAX framework / library and a comprehensive widget

[google-appengine] Re: Somewhat Disappointed.

2009-03-09 Thread nima dilmaghani
If you wait until the Google IO conference, there just may be an announcement there that satisfies you. Cheers, Nima On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:52 PM, peterh wrote: > > http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/ > Pyjamas is a cross-browser Web App development API that allows you to > write your client si

[google-appengine] Re: Somewhat Disappointed.

2009-03-09 Thread Tim Hoffman
Here is my guess I would consider a likely second language for gae will be Javascript. google has v8, it runs javascript fast and in a controlled environment, sure there may not be heaps of hi-level framworks, but I could imagine it would be a good candidate. (lots of control over the runtime wh