Re: [google-appengine] Re: The memory tax

2011-06-01 Thread Robert Kluin
Hey Greg, As I recall that API just returns the current total and average memory used by the instance, right? That is helpful for debugging memory usage, but trying to guess what part of the machinery caused the memory usage to spike between calls is still guessing. Just trying to guess if a sp

Re: [google-appengine] Re: The memory tax

2011-05-31 Thread Greg Darke (Google)
On 1 June 2011 14:54, Bart Thate wrote: > > Once memory is billable, you gonna be sure that people actually try to make > good use of it. If you do instance price only who cares ? > As for debugging you might have point maybe google could provide the an app > stats API where the app could monito

Re: [google-appengine] Re: The memory tax

2011-05-31 Thread Bart Thate
Oi Robert ;] responses below @jsonbot Heerhugowaard, Netherlands programming schizofrenic - http://jsonbot.appspot.com On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Robert Kluin wrote: > There have been one or two other threads where this has been suggested > as well. I originally had a similar thought,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: The memory tax

2011-05-31 Thread Robert Kluin
There have been one or two other threads where this has been suggested as well. I originally had a similar thought, but after some thought I honestly think it sounds very complicated, you'll have both CPU hours and memory-meg-hours (or whatever). I sometimes see much higher memory usage than expe

[google-appengine] Re: The memory tax

2011-05-31 Thread JH
I'd prefer this over the instance billing as well On May 31, 8:36 pm, Bart Thate wrote: > Greetings ! > > As i understand it this whole move of Google is because they discovered that > it is the memory occupied thats is the cost factor requiring this drastic > move. So if that is the case why not