[google-appengine] Re: problems with Java 1.7.0_21 and the dev_appserver

2013-05-25 Thread Mathias Kegelmann
I ran some more experiments to narrow down the problem: - I made a tiny test webstart project with a self signed JAR and that works fine with 1.7u21. - If I start the program from saved files - JNLP file on the local disk, JAR on the disk and the JNLP adapted so it uses the local JAR -

[google-appengine] Re: problems with Java 1.7.0_21 and the dev_appserver

2013-05-25 Thread Mathias Kegelmann
Just looked at the headers the app sends: HTTP/1.1 200 OK X-TraceUrl: /appstats/details?time=1369478620521type=json Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate Pragma: no-cache Expires: Fri, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:00 GMT content-disposition: attachment;

[google-appengine] Re: problems with Java 1.7.0_21 and the dev_appserver

2013-05-25 Thread Gary Frederick
It works if you use Java 1.7.0_17 (and Java 6). Is there a difference in the headers with the older version? Gary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[google-appengine] Re: problems with Java 1.7.0_21 and the dev_appserver

2013-05-25 Thread Mathias Kegelmann
On Saturday, 25 May 2013 13:54:20 UTC+2, Gary Frederick wrote: It works if you use Java 1.7.0_17 (and Java 6). Is there a difference in the headers with the older version? Gary I don't think the headers changed, I think that javaws interprets the HTTP headers in a stricter way. I narrowed

[google-appengine] Re: problems with Java 1.7.0_21 and the dev_appserver

2013-05-25 Thread Gary Frederick
!!! Thanks for the post and the research Gary On Saturday, May 25, 2013 7:43:39 AM UTC-5, Mathias Kegelmann wrote: On Saturday, 25 May 2013 13:54:20 UTC+2, Gary Frederick wrote: It works if you use Java 1.7.0_17 (and Java 6). Is there a difference in the headers with the older version?

[google-appengine] Re: problems with Java 1.7.0_21 and the dev_appserver

2013-05-23 Thread Mathias Kegelmann
I'm not sure this helps, but here's what I observed: - Looking at the stacktrace and com.sun.javaws.security.JNLPSignedResourcesHelper, com.sun.deploy.cache.ResourceProviderImpl.getCachedResourceFilePath and com.sun.deploy.cache.Cache.getCachedResourceFilePath I think that javaws is looking