On Sunday, May 15, 2011 2:03:39 AM UTC+1, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
>
> And I noticed that SOME Company I won’t name, names…. Every Time they Run
> an Ad on one of my pages they seem to think they need to send the AD bot,
> and the Index Bot (twice) to the page, and they always do it with in 3
> se
om] On Behalf Of Gregory D'alesandre
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 11:10 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] HR applications and Cache
Control/Pragma/Expires headers
If this was an existing app prior to 1.5.0 then it is not fixed yet, 1.5.0
put the fix
If this was an existing app prior to 1.5.0 then it is not fixed yet, 1.5.0
put the fix in but we still need to clean up apps that were created prior to
1.5.0.
Hope that helps,
Greg
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Stephen Johnson wrote:
> I'm confused. I have an HR app and this is what I see w
**
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> google-appengine@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert Schuppenies
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 11, 2011 8:21 AM
>
> *To:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] HR appl
I'm confused. I have an HR app and this is what I see when I look at the
headers using Firebug for one of my images. You're saying this should be
different?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Francois Masurel wrote:
> What is rather strange is that cache headers work perfectly fine with MS
> applica
What is rather strange is that cache headers work perfectly fine with MS
applications.
I hope it's not a way to increase billing ;-)
I'm personaly concerned as I'm serving most of my image and file contents
dynamically from datastore or memcache.
--
You received this message because you are s
either”… *Head Thwak*
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Robert Schuppenies
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 8:21 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] HR applications and Cache
Control/Pragma/Expires
Do you know if there is a bug filed for this, already?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> I’d +100 this and I don’t +1 anything since Google made it a product and I
> fear they will come after me….
>
>
>
> I agree the lack of cache header on HR is a big issue, since all my C
Interesting solution… proxy the HR instance through an MS instance that just
changes the headers… Sure it will add 22 cents a gig, but you get the cache
headers and HR’s uptime. :-)
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Francois Masur
I’d +100 this and I don’t +1 anything since Google made it a product and I
fear they will come after me….
I agree the lack of cache header on HR is a big issue, since all my CSS and
JS files get re-downed every page view which is slowing down my CDN product,
but MS has too high of Down Time at
10 matches
Mail list logo
