True, but there is also CPU overhead for the two rpcs if the Cache Hit
ratio is low
-A
On Jan 5, 2012 6:02 PM, "Jason Collins" wrote:
> There is still $$ difference. Memcache is (or appears to be) free,
> datastore reads are not.
> j
>
> On Jan 5, 8:01 am, Andrin von Rechenberg wrote:
> > H
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrin von
Rechenberg
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 2:11 PM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Caching datastore gets in memcache,
worth it?
True, but there is al
True, but there is also CPU overhead for the two rpcs.
On Jan 5, 2012 6:02 PM, "Jason Collins" wrote:
> There is still $$ difference. Memcache is (or appears to be) free,
> datastore reads are not.
> j
>
> On Jan 5, 8:01 am, Andrin von Rechenberg wrote:
> > Hey there
> >
> > For latency reasons
