HI all:
So curious that i can not delete entity data from the local admin console,
when i select one record and hit delete, it shows message "2 entities
deleted." but from the view, they are still there without changes!
I met this problem from v1.6.1, after upgrade to 1.6.3, problem still
the
Hello all,
if I delete my app from the application console, it’s written there that
after 3 days or so the app will be finally deleted, but the name will be
still reserved. Does it mean that I can then create a new application of
the same name? I would like to do this to migrate to HRD, as the
Hi,
No it means that the name will no longer be usable, unfortunately.
Application names appear to last forever, no matter whether the app has
been deleted, so the only way to retain the same app name externally is to
use the HRD migration tool.
Cheers,
Simon
On Monday, 19 March 2012 11:27:
Hi,
I'm looking for some very successful websites (10 million unique users
per year perhaps) built on Google App Engine. We've had a lot of
issues with it, and our confidence in it is a bit shaken, and need to
make decisions.
I'd particularly like to hear of GAE-Java successes.
I know Gigapan is
+1
El 19 de marzo de 2012 15:20, Amir escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some very successful websites (10 million unique users
> per year perhaps) built on Google App Engine. We've had a lot of
> issues with it, and our confidence in it is a bit shaken, and need to
> make decisions.
>
> I'd pa
No, that can’t work, the HRD migration tool doesn’t offer to migrate to the
same application id.
Dne pondělí, 19. března 2012 18:19:19 UTC+1 Simon Knott napsal(a):
>
> Hi,
>
> No it means that the name will no longer be usable, unfortunately.
>
> Application names appear to last forever, no ma
You can't migrate to the same app-id, but you can have the new application
aliased behind the old app-id. There are some issues around email services
coming from the new app-id, I believe, but apart from that your application
appears for all intents and purposes to be the "old" app-id.
Cheers,
Hie
I updated the post again. I dont see a stack trace at all. just a
java.io.exception.
See at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9755670/storing-data-to-google-cloud-storage-using-gae-for-java
Please advise, we are blocked on this now
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
h
what's the app id?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Vik wrote:
> Hie
>
> I updated the post again. I dont see a stack trace at all. just a
> java.io.exception.
>
> See at
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9755670/storing-data-to-google-cloud-storage-using-gae-for-java
>
> Please advise, we
Hie
It is: sakshumweb20
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Stuart Langley wrote:
> what's the app id?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Vik wrote:
>
>> Hie
>>
>> I updated the post again. I dont see a stack t
Is this it?
2012-03-17 16:08:46.653
vik.sakshum.sakshumweb.server.common.CommonServiceCode
createCertificate: Exception class is :java.io.IOException
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Vik wrote:
> Hie
>
> It is: sakshumweb20
>
> Thankx and Regards
>
> Vik
> Founder
> http://www.sakshum.org
Hie Stuart
I removed the catch block and i still do not see stack trace at all. Log
still shows only java.io.exception.
Please advise
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Jean-François Geyelin
wrote:
> For what it's w
looks like it still hits your catch block to me
vik.sakshum.sakshumweb.server.common.CommonServiceCode
createCertificate: Exception class is :java.io.IOException
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Vik wrote:
> Hie Stuart
>
> I removed the catch block and i still do not see stack trace at all.
what's this at line 485?
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
log.severe("Exception in finally of execute of getGoogleDoc");
log.severe("Exception class is :" +
e.getClass().getName());
log.severe("Exception is :" + e.getMessage());
Sorry may be i lost in the different branches.
Though results are same. I just double checked it.
and attaching that file again which is now at server as well.
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Stuart Langley wro
I don't see any errors
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Vik wrote:
> Sorry may be i lost in the different branches.
>
> Though results are same. I just double checked it.
>
> and attaching that file again which is now at server as well.
>
>
>
>
> Thankx and Regards
>
> Vik
> Founder
> http://www
and there is no data as well getting stored.
The call gets lost after FileService fileService =
FileServiceFactory.getFileService();
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Stuart Langley wrote:
> I don't see any errors
No doubt - you don't set an object name and most likely you don't own the
bucket called "blood" and no doubt your catching and swallowing the
exception somewhere else in the code
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Vik wrote:
> and there is no data as well getting stored.
>
> The call gets lost aft
i gave u both the files which are calling this code.
I have created that bucked blood so i should only own it.
and above all how to find if that is the case? I am not really eating up
the exception anywhere
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Mon,
19 matches
Mail list logo
