[appengine-java] Re: Google App Engine MUD

2010-10-12 Thread Fattom
gh, so please let > me know. To me it sounds much more difficult to write a client and > server using telnet. > > Thanks, > > MLS > > On Oct 3, 10:55 pm, 番頭Fattom wrote: > > > > > > > > > If the client access server with HTTP, GAE is definit

[appengine-java] Re: Google App Engine MUD

2010-10-04 Thread Fattom
If the client access server with HTTP, GAE is definitely OK. But in my experience, Telnet is a better protocol for Mud/BBS. And I think GAE do not support socket function. If GAE support WebSocket, it will be a good way to approach that... (but I am not sure about this feature.) The most importa