Jason: good point and yes the code did work
Leszek: good point!
Thanks all for the help.
On Sep 3, 9:27 am, leszek wrote:
> Keep also in mind that it is not enough to convert 'Child' to 'Key'
> while persisting 'Parent'. You should also set key to Parent in Child,
> otherwise, having Child only
work?
Thanks.
FF
On Sep 1, 11:54 am, funkforce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, thanks for posting, it really helps me.
>
> objectuser : Good post and the link was really nice.
> Albert Attard : Thanks for the examples, it shows that you have to
> wright lots of co
Hi,
First of all, thanks for posting, it really helps me.
objectuser : Good post and the link was really nice.
Albert Attard : Thanks for the examples, it shows that you have to
wright lots of code to manage your own relationships (which I was
trying to avoid).
leszek: This is what I did and I
Hope this helps, even though it's not much
> Albert Attard
>
> Ogden Nash <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/o/ogden_nash.html> -
> "The trouble with a kitten is that when it grows up, it's always a cat."
>
> 2009/8/31 funkforce
>
>
>
Hi
Can someone post a full example of working code with unowned
relationships? It semas that several pople are havning problems with
this on I cant find any solution posted in this group yet.
I think that I must use unowned relationships in my code. If I am
mistaken please correct me.
I have a
