Hi,
Nice release!
I could not find any docs on the "Custom Admin Console pages"
feature... Can you please point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Viktor
On Feb 11, 12:15 am, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote:
> Check it out!
>
> http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2010/02/app-engine-sdk-131-includ...
, since
> they're not Java specific.
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:29 PM, phraktle wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Can the Google team please shed some light on the issue of multiple
> > datacenters in various geographical locations pertaining GAE? I would
> > like to
Filed as a bug: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2725
v.
On Feb 3, 1:34 pm, phraktle wrote:
> I have no issues with data store or memcache partitioning/versioning.
> I know how to evolve the schema, how to deal with serialization
> changes, applying version
Hi,
Can the Google team please shed some light on the issue of multiple
datacenters in various geographical locations pertaining GAE? I would
like to understand what characteristics and what level of guarantees
to expect from a GAE app, and didn't find any docs or posts on this...
1. Is static co
Hi,
Cool! Is there a JavaDoc available for the new features?
Regards,
Viktor
On Feb 4, 5:32 am, Takashi Matsuo wrote:
> Hi Ikai,
>
> Cool!
>
> It might be trivial but, I've filed an issue with SDK 1.3.1
> prerelease.http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2721
>
> --
> Tak
that would be more elegant.
Regards,
Viktor
On Feb 2, 7:28 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote:
> That's interesting. Let me follow up with the team to try to understand how
> this is supposed to work.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:05 AM, phraktle
ug, because in some regards it's nice that data is shared,
> > but in other situations it's not. It would be nice to be able to
> > "compartmentalize" an app somehow.
>
> > :-) Kasper
>
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM, phraktle wrote:
> >> Hi,
Hi,
There appears to be a bug - or at least undesired behavior - regarding
cron jobs. Let's say there's a "test" and a "production" (the active)
version of an app. If you add a cron job to cron.xml in "test", one
would expect that job is bound to that specific version. Instead what
I'm seeing:
-
Plus, it's working okay in the development server :)
V.
On Feb 2, 9:03 am, phraktle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this case grabTail would be quite useless, as one cannot really
> construct queues with it (ie. it would just force removing items from
> all namespaces that wouldn
e LRU mechanism if memcache needed more space. There isn't a different
> "queue" per namespace, only a "queue" for global expirations.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:29 AM, phraktle wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > On production, grabTail returns
Hi,
On production, grabTail returns objects from other namespaces. This is
a significant problem that
makes grabTail (thus queue-like usage) unusable.
I filed this as a bug, with a very simple example here:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2706
Can you please look into t
al
> representations, but you can be assured that there is only one stored
> version of it (not counting foreign key references or replication, of
> course).
>
> I don't work for Google, but I watched the Google I/O video on
> BigTable. You should too.
>
> Jeff
>
>
could someone from Google weigh in on this?
thanks,
Viktor
On Jan 6, 12:43 pm, phraktle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the low-level DS API, thus short names for kinds, etc, and
> my keys are already quite compact. The encoded version is in fact
> significantly longer than my
saves a significant amount of space in my
> app that has many relations between entities.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/twig-persist/
>
> On Jan 4, 5:01 pm, phraktle wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm generating my own entity keys, with new Entity("Foo"
Hi,
I'm generating my own entity keys, with new Entity("Foo", "myId"). I
noticed that in the DataStore viewer, these entities still seem to
have a default key:
Decoded entity key: Foo: name=myId
Entity key:
ahFzY2FyYWJyZWNvbW1lbmRlcnJACxIVUHJvZHVjdFJlY29tbWVuZGF0aW9uIiU1OTg1MEMzMzMwOUZGRjV8MjAxMD
hing up.
>
> I'd go ahead and file this as a feature
> request:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:49 AM, phraktle wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Is there a way to actually lower the timeout for a given
Hi,
Is there a way to actually lower the timeout for a given request? In
some cases I would like to guarantee a quicker response time (eg.
subsecond) and bail out if it's not happening (eg. due to a temporary
slowness in the datastore). Of course, one could just check
currentTimeMillis from all ov
Hi,
I'm using the Java low-level Datastore API, in a local unit test (as
described here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/howto/unittesting.htm):
I'm trying to run a prefix search on __key__ (which I generated in the
first place), as per the usual range-query hack:
q.addFilter(Entity.
18 matches
Mail list logo
