[appengine-java] Re: Google App Engine MUD

2010-10-12 Thread 番頭Fattom
What you want is An Easy Version MUD or Complete Version MUD? If you want to hardcode all the thing, you only have to know what is AJAX. It's easy. But if you want to implement a real MUD, Complete Version MUD, you have to know a lot of things. ex: how to write a compiler... Because MUD is

[appengine-java] Re: Google App Engine MUD

2010-10-04 Thread 番頭Fattom
If the client access server with HTTP, GAE is definitely OK. But in my experience, Telnet is a better protocol for Mud/BBS. And I think GAE do not support socket function. If GAE support WebSocket, it will be a good way to approach that... (but I am not sure about this feature.) The most

[appengine-java] Re: Google App Engine MUD

2010-10-04 Thread MLS
Hi Fattom, Thanks for your response. I don't think most browsers support Websockets quite yet, and I don't want to tie people to a specific one. What is the most challenging part of writing a MUD for http aside from real time delivery, which I'm hoping Ajax push solves? Aside from that I believe