Bah, I didn't read clearly. That's quite interesting, if GAE supports
it.
midomarocain, have you tried it? Please let us know if it works.
On Aug 25, 7:39 am, datanucleus wrote:
> Yes you *can* do that. I already pointed out the query above, which
> the user seems to ignore for some reason.
>
thanks you very much
On 25 août, 12:43, datanucleus wrote:
> > Yes you *can* do that. I already pointed out the query above, which
> > the user seems to ignore for some reason.
> > "IN" in Java equates to "collParam.contains(theField)"
> > i.e this value is IN this collection.
>
> Obviously th
> Yes you *can* do that. I already pointed out the query above, which
> the user seems to ignore for some reason.
> "IN" in Java equates to "collParam.contains(theField)"
> i.e this value is IN this collection.
Obviously that assumes that Google have implemented such a thing,
though they could ea
> Right, you won't be able to do that. The underlying datastore doesn't
> support "OR" queries (and "IN" -> "OR").
Yes you *can* do that. I already pointed out the query above, which
the user seems to ignore for some reason.
"IN" in Java equates to "collParam.contains(theField)"
i.e this value i
Right, you won't be able to do that. The underlying datastore doesn't
support "OR" queries (and "IN" -> "OR").
If the # of elements in inputParam is small, you could run a query for
each one. Otherwise, you might want to consider storing the
collection and reversing the query.
On Aug 25, 4:16
the input param is a collection
i want the equivallent of this request
select * from X where fieldOfX in (inputParam)
thanks in advance
On 24 août, 14:28, datanucleus wrote:
> An IN clause ? you mean you pass in a parameter ("inputParam") that is
> a Collection and then say something like t
An IN clause ? you mean you pass in a parameter ("inputParam") that is
a Collection and then say something like this ?
inputParam.contains(someFieldOfMyClass)
That's Java, so is JDOQL.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
