Yep, I'm going though and making those changes now. Note that the
Queue documentation says, "Implementations of this interface must be
threadsafe." So that one's OK.
Vince
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Hi Vince
> I removed all of the static qualifiers from CachingDatastore
That sounds reasonable to me.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> Hi Max
>
> Thx for the answer, especially the correction on the transaction
> implementation.
>
> The solution I'd arrived at is to use Guice to instantiate my DsS with a
> scope of @RequestScoped. Do you see any pro
Hi Max
Thx for the answer, especially the correction on the transaction
implementation.
The solution I'd arrived at is to use Guice to instantiate my DsS with a
scope of @RequestScoped. Do you see any problems with that approach?
best
Roy
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Max Ross (Google)
> wr
A DatastoreService instance is extremely lightweight so feel free to create
them as-needed. In addition, transactions are not tied to a specific
DatastoreService instance but rather to the thread that started the
transaction. Finally, assume that all classes in the api are _not_
threadsafe unless
