Re: [appengine-java] Re: gaeom - new option for lightweight, high performance object mapping

2011-07-21 Thread Ikai Lan (Google)
For JSON encoding, I've used this with POJO and POJO like objects: http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/ This makes easy things trivial and hard things ... well hard things are not that easy. Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitte

[appengine-java] Re: gaeom - new option for lightweight, high performance object mapping

2011-07-21 Thread Peter Murray
Hi Roberto, I should have a complete example ready for posting in the next couple of days. The application I'm currently working on is using Spring for request routing and Codehaus Jackson for JSON encoding - seems to work pretty well. Since gaeom does not alter the classes or wrap them in proxi

[appengine-java] Re: gaeom - new option for lightweight, high performance object mapping

2011-07-21 Thread J.Ganesan
Excellent. gaeom indeed gives an object-covering to Google App Engine. The developer can get the feeling that GAE is an embedded database. J.Ganesan www.DataStoreGwt.com On Jul 20, 2:41 am, Peter Murray wrote: > Greetings Java Appengine folks, > > I've just released the first beta of gaeom 1.0.0

[appengine-java] Re: gaeom - new option for lightweight, high performance object mapping

2011-07-20 Thread Roberto Saccon
Great. I am currently a happy user of slim3, but I am always interested in evaluating other approaches. Do you have somewhere a simple, but complete example app ? Is there a particular JSON encoder/decoder you recommend for using with gaeom ? -- You received this message because you are subscr