Onsite regionals wound be great, but you have to remember the budget issues that already affected GCJ 2009.
I would like to have a chance to go onsite (since I've manage to be in the top500 in 2009), but I prefer to have a GJC 2010 without onsite regionals than not having GCJ 2010 at all. I'm sure that the organizers will do their best to have a great GCJ 2010! On Feb 5, 4:43 pm, Rajesh V <vrajesh1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please consider our requests for onsite regionals. It may increase the > probability of visiting Google office by some of the coders, who dream > to see Google office. > > Regards, > Rajesh V. > > On Feb 4, 2:33 pm, CaustiQue <mr.demi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As for me, there's no important reason to consider all requests, and > > it would be better to know final schedule as soon as possible > > nevertheless someone won't be pleased. > > > Since GCJ is free of charges, organisers have a right to determine > > their rules independently. I think, TopCoder is a good example. > > There's an announcement on its page with expected dates of rounds: > > "These dates are subject to change with or without notice until the > > official announcement of the TCO happens at the end of March. Please > > note we will only change dates if it is necessary for our schedule and > > we will not be changing any dates per member requests". > > > As for number of participants on finals, I agree with Luke Pebody: > > it'd be rather better to arrange more contests instead invite on the > > onsite round more contestants. > > > Cheers, > > Igor. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
