How can I adjust my account to let all other people even those living
in prohibited (forbidden) countries find the ability to download the
files included in my accounts? I mean, when downloading they do not
encounter error 403. Please, explain the full instruction step by step
and in detail.
--
On May 16, 3:01 am, Mohammad Sh foxt...@gmail.com wrote:
How can I adjust my account to let all other people even those living
in prohibited (forbidden) countries find the ability to download the
files included in my accounts? I mean, when downloading they do not
encounter error 403.
i get same problem. i don't know how to fix this problem.
i just have several expectation :
1. internet connection using proxy
2. one of our team member not included in project members list at
https://code.google.com/p/PROJECT_NAME/adminMembers
pleas...i very very need a solution for this
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:08 AM, jonathansamuel aristede...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running CENTOS 5.3 and the current version of Mercurial. When I
push I get the following error:
[r...@localhost getnewip]# hg push
pushing to https://getnewip.googlecode.com/hg/
searching for changes
http
How can we test whether a user has permission to commit to our
project?
I wrote an Apache authn handler to control access to our master
Subversion repository based on whether a user is a committer to our
Google project hosting project - I describe it in this blog post,
Our new (much faster) Subversion server now allows all reads to be
anonymous, just like our Mercurial server -- SSL or not. The only way
to get an authn challenge is to do a write request. Maybe you could
do something simple like a remote modification of a revision-property.
For example, you
Dear Sir/Madam
when I write the following xml in the wiki page, it doesn't come
out correctly, Please tell me how can I paste my xml into the wiki
page. thanks
`pre`
xml
a /
bpeter/b
/xml
`/pre`
from Peter (cmk...@hotmail.com)
--
You received this message because you are
I think the answer is If the first round starts, and you can enter,
then enter whether or not you have received the invitation. Are there
arguments for any other course of action?
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:32 AM, profvip.abotaleb
profvip.abota...@gmail.com wrote:
@TripleM
You mean once the
If you have solved at-least one problem completely (33 points), you go
through. No
invites needed !
HTH
-- Shree
http://www.shreekumar.in/
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Luke Pebody luke.peb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the answer is If the first round starts, and you can enter,
then enter
How can Marek (1491) have a score of 89?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-codejam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Yes I know but how could he solve the large without solving the small?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-codejam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
The problem is that the rules say that:
*Rules for Large Input/Output Sets:* *You must correctly solve the small
input/output set before you may download the large input file*. After
downloading the large input file, you will have eight minutes to submit the
output (along with your source code).
May be, he produced the wrond source code for small input. Then he could
solve large input, but after contest his small input solution was marked as
incorrect and he lost 10 points.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Felipe Sodré Silva fso...@gmail.comwrote:
The problem is that the rules say
I wouldn't think so - you can, after all, submit different sources for
the small and the big input (my small-input source for problem C was
pretty much brute force, and the big-input source contains the more
refined algorithm that allowed me to actually solve it under 8
minutes)
On May 16, 2:18
Well, the same happened with me.
I had submitted wrong source for the small. While submitting the large , I
realised my mistake.
Then, I asked the question to the Google admins, who made my small input
invalid. At that point my large input was correct while small was wrong.
Following that I
BTW Sampath/Dmitry,
Have you guys received the notification mail from google about round 1?
I am yet to recieve the mail though the score on codejam page tells me I am
eligible for Round 1.
Or is google sending out mail in the order of ranks and I am lowly ranked
mortal.
Regards,
Rajesh Nair
Abdelrhman Abotaleb,
*
*
You are solving the problem in the same way by deriving the formula. Even I
came to the same conclusion that ( Number of clicks)+1 divided by (2^(number
of snappers) should be an integer number.
But I'm interested to know what is your method of deriving the formula..
On
hey here let us know each other's experience as coder(in terms of
months n years),
just type in..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-codejam group.
To post to this group, send email to google-c...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group,
n is int in this casehow can pow(2,n) can workit requires
both the arguments to be double???
On May 15, 11:15 pm, tonka ritwik.sami1...@gmail.com wrote:
why the heck will you write such a clumsy and lengthy code??? take a
look at my code:
#includeiostream.h
#includefstream.h
the information given by you is good..but in other situations the
text written by you is not so much clearcould you please clearly
post it.what is to use logn multiplications
Thanks for help
On May 15, 11:50 pm, Davi Costa daf...@gmail.com wrote:
You should take care about (long
@Leo - probably got the right code unknowingly for the large input?
On 16 May 2010 23:48, Leopoldo Taravilse ltaravi...@gmail.com wrote:
So musn't he lose the score for the Large too?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-codejam group.
To
Unless you are using a very old compiler/computer, int is a 32 bit integer,
the range is [-2147483648, 2147483647].
And even if they were 16 bit, the range would be [-32768, 32767].
About the logn multiplication I think he meant O(log n) exponentiation.
Type fast exponentiation in Google, and
I agree with you, this is something really god!
2010/5/16 mohan krishna mohan_thekris...@yahoo.com
i don't know how you felt but (though i belong to INDIA) i really felt
very happy by seeing people from Afghanistan participating in the
contest and advancing to next round..
may be the number
I believe in your compiler, int will be 2 bytes and long int will be 4
bytes. Check that once. If so, you can use long int instead of int
everywhere. That way you can store an integer in the order of 10^8.
On 16 May 2010 02:07, Aamir Khan aamir.cod...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah i got my mistake
How do you measure your experience? Is that like when you first
learned computer language or first started making serious programs?
Because I learned computer language when i was like 10 and it was
QBASIC, but i started making more or less serious stuff in college so
I suppose it would be 4-5
near 5 years
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:01 PM, just justforchitc...@ymail.com wrote:
hey here let us know each other's experience as coder(in terms of
months n years),
just type in..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-codejam group.
To
10 months
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Qasim Zeeshan newbillga...@gmail.comwrote:
6 years 3 months
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:01 PM, just justforchitc...@ymail.com wrote:
hey here let us know each other's experience as coder(in terms of
months n years),
just type in..
--
You
Yeah, I measured it from college studies.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Lev Neiman lev.nei...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you measure your experience? Is that like when you first
learned computer language or first started making serious programs?
Because I learned computer language when i
@Lev Neiman Same here... learnt QBASIC, DBASE, C, etc 6 years ago... am into
actual coding only for the past 10 months...
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 6:08 AM, ruiguo yang spotlight...@gmail.com wrote:
near 5 years
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:01 PM, just justforchitc...@ymail.com wrote:
hey here
29 matches
Mail list logo
