Sort first array, reverse sort second array, for every element of first array,
you got it's corresponding smallest elements in second array, multiply them
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Code Jam" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and sto
The main idea is the rearrangement inequality; check out the contest
analysis ^^.
On 14 Apr 2016 14:13, "akhil patel" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As i have been doing this problem in python using my own method which
> computes for the all possible permutations and finding the scalar product
> for all the ve
Hi,
As i have been doing this problem in python using my own method which computes
for the all possible permutations and finding the scalar product for all the
vectors.Finally finding the min of all these solutions.
It took few secs to find the solution to 2 given example problems but if i go
1 4 7 isn't a wrong solution of K=3 C=2 S=3. Why do you say it's wrong?
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 16:34 Kapil Garg wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2016 7:56 PM, "Paul Smith" wrote:
> >
> > Yes, but you could solve it when S=2 with 2, 6, and you could not solve
> it with 3, 7.
> >
> > Are you asking if you
On Apr 13, 2016 7:56 PM, "Paul Smith" wrote:
>
> Yes, but you could solve it when S=2 with 2, 6, and you could not solve
it with 3, 7.
>
> Are you asking if you could solve it with 2, 6, 7 when S=3? Then yes, of
course, adding tile 7 does nothing to change the fact that 2, 6 was already
a perfect
Yes, but you could solve it when S=2 with 2, 6, and you could not solve it
with 3, 7.
Are you asking if you could solve it with 2, 6, 7 when S=3? Then yes, of
course, adding tile 7 does nothing to change the fact that 2, 6 was already
a perfectly good solution.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 14:17 Mohit
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 7:27:38 PM UTC+5:30, Xiongqi ZHANG wrote:
> > I read it but I think I am missing something to get right...
> > I just want to know that in Problem D: Fractiles
> > (https://code.google.com/codejam/contest/6254486/dashboard#s=p3) at In
> > sample case #5, how valid so
