yes, that happened to me. my naive solution was processing 350+th case when 8 minutes is up. i have a c2duo 2 ghz
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Nate Bauernfeind < nate.bauernfe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Given that you have a 2 cores, you could've run the program twice in > parallel in about 3.5 minutes. Of course, if you don't plan ahead then > you're pushing your luck hoping it'll work. > > On Sep 12, 1:00 am, cyberfish <cyberf...@wecheer.com> wrote: > > Just thought I should point out that, for the large input of question > > A (round 1A), my program solved it in a little under 7 minutes on my > > computer (a Core 2 Duo overclocked to 3.3ghz). A slower computer may > > not have made it, so I think this gives an unfair advantage to people > > with fast computers (like myself) :). > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
