Re: [gcj] Likelihood of more supported languages for 2019

2019-02-12 Thread Narut
Since you mention popular requests for different versions, it would be great if we could use C++17 :). On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 6:20:03 PM UTC-6, Pablo Heiber wrote: > Hi Rob, > > > We strive to follow the order of popularity of languages in Code Jam 2017, > with the addition of popula

Re: [gcj] Likelihood of more supported languages for 2019

2019-02-01 Thread 'Pablo Heiber' via Google Code Jam
> > Reading between the lines, should we infer that you're not ready to commit > to new languages for 2019, but not quite ready to rule it out either? > Yes, that's a reasonable reading :). Best, Pablo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Ja

Re: [gcj] Likelihood of more supported languages for 2019

2019-01-31 Thread Rob Lachlan
Pablo, thanks very much for the kind response. I realize that there's a tremendous amount of work involved in organizing something like this, and that your backlog has a lot of necessary items on it. I'm very grateful that you put codejam on. Reading between the lines, should we infer that yo

Re: [gcj] Likelihood of more supported languages for 2019

2019-01-31 Thread 'Pablo Heiber' via Google Code Jam
Hi Rob, We strive to follow the order of popularity of languages in Code Jam 2017, with the addition of popular requests for both languages and additional libraries to languages we already have, different versions, etc. We may skip some due to technical or legal (licencing) issues. Rust and Scala

[gcj] Likelihood of more supported languages for 2019

2019-01-31 Thread Rob Lachlan
How likely is it that more languages will be added for this year's competition? I'm most interested in Rust, but I think there are other languages that people are interested in. D, Ocaml, and Scala, for instance have fans and are supported by codeforces among other judges. -- You received